Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Patidar
    Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 10

    SOLiD PE 50/25 50/35 mapping using BFAST

    Hi,
    I am running BFAST on SOLiD PE data, the workflow is:
    Indexing of hg19 using 10 masks in BFAST pdf 7.1.2

    Solid2fastq (bfast version)
    Give the following output:

    Outputting, currently on:
    105443471
    Found
    number_of_ends number_of_reads
    1 0
    2 105443471

    Then I do mapping using default parameters but the Number of reads mapped with 2 ends mapped (postprocess STDOUT)is strange:
    Found 1330976 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 1352354 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 739903 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 2092482 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 1834718 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 1835699 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 2068385 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 1070307 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 2232393 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 2293698 reads with 2 ends mapped.
    Found 1747380 reads with 2 ends mapped.

    This is like ~18 reads are PE but the solid2fastq says all the reads are PE.

    Any Help is highly appreciated!!
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    What was your postprocess command line? Did you set the paired end options?

    Comment

    • Patidar
      Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 10

      #3
      Hi Nils,

      I am running in PE mode i.e. Y=0 and the I am setting PE to 170 and PI SD to 50.

      Thanks,

      Comment

      • nilshomer
        Nils Homer
        • Nov 2008
        • 1283

        #4
        When you look at a few mappings, are they correctly orientated? Perhaps the input was reverse complimented or the order was switched?

        Comment

        • Patidar
          Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 10

          #5
          I mapped the same sample using bioscope and the PE % was much higher. and the stats from bioscope says that the PI is from 150-250. So I guess the % should drop but not that much.

          Also I ran the same sample with PI 180 and PI SD 20 and the Stats after postprocessing are exactly the same. not even a single decrease or increase in number.

          If the order is switched, solid2fastq will complain or not ?
          I have not looked into the bam. Silly Question How to know if the reads are RC from Bam ?


          Thanks.

          Comment

          • nilshomer
            Nils Homer
            • Nov 2008
            • 1283

            #6
            Look at the SAM file produced by BFAST. See if pairs are on the correct strand and within the insert size range.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            13 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...