Header Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

N vs Z nucleotide

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

SEQanswers June Challenge Has Begun!

The competition has begun! We're giving away a $50 Amazon gift card to the member who answers the most questions on our site during the month. We want to encourage our community members to share their knowledge and help each other out by answering questions related to sequencing technologies, genomics, and bioinformatics. The competition is open to all members of the site, and the winner will be announced at the beginning of July. Best of luck!

For a list of the official rules, visit (https://www.seqanswers.com/forum/sit...wledge-and-win)
See more
See less
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pmiguel
    replied
    If you think about it, using a DNA polymerase is like doing a single base (1 mer) ligation.

    --
    Phillip

    Leave a comment:


  • joskee
    replied
    Originally posted by Joann View Post
    You could explore that question further with the authors of the article. Don't forget to consider posting results of discussion here.
    answer I got: only one from 1024 possible types of oligonucleotides is suitable for ligation. Both "XY-dinucleotide" and degenerate part should be complementary to the template for the succesfull ligation, universal bases are not specific

    I still find it weird, why they just dont use universal bases in general (for the 6 others nucleotides and not just 3).. rather then doing that, they make 1024 possible types of oligonucleotide...

    I suppose its to make them more specific because otherwise you would get more wrongly hybridised pieces.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joann
    replied
    You could explore that question further with the authors of the article. Don't forget to consider posting results of discussion here.

    Leave a comment:


  • joskee
    replied
    Originally posted by Joann View Post
    Look at Table 3, page 1387 in

    doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq098

    on extended IUPAC nomenclature code
    Ok thanks.

    But this brings me to my next question: whats the idea/point behind having those "z" nucleotides and the "n" ones?
    Why not just "n" for all of them?

    Isnt it better to have all "n" nucleotides , so it can bind any nucleotide?

    Leave a comment:


  • Joann
    replied
    Look at Table 3, page 1387 in

    doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq098

    on extended IUPAC nomenclature code

    Leave a comment:


  • joskee
    started a topic N vs Z nucleotide

    N vs Z nucleotide

    Dear all,
    What does a "z" means in term of nucleotides?

    I am assuming that the "n" means: any base (so it could be any base that binds those "n" spots).

    See attaced figure for "n" and "z".
    Attached Files

Latest Articles

Collapse

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 08:56 PM
0 responses
8 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 06-01-2023, 07:33 AM
0 responses
8 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 05-31-2023, 07:50 AM
0 responses
4 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 05-26-2023, 09:22 AM
0 responses
10 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X