Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • throwaway
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 9

    #1

    Any data on SOLiD error characteristics?

    I would like to find some information on the distribution of errors in SOLiD data. I'm planning to use it to simulate a pooling sequencing strategy like the "DNA Sudoku" approach, and assess how badly SOLiD's error rate hurts the capacity to uniquely resolve variants in this scheme.

    If I just assume errors are uniformly distributed along reads with a frequency of 0.03%, I am pretty sure the answer will be "Not much, go for it!" But I suspect that error model is too optimistic, and there are errors which correlate with sequence position and context. Ideally, I'd like to find a paper like "Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing", but for SOLiD rather than Illumina. Is there such a paper?

    Another possibility would be a large corpus of public SOLiD data from loci which have been sequenced by other methods, so I could compare and look for and characterize errors myself.
  • nilshomer
    Nils Homer
    • Nov 2008
    • 1283

    #2
    Originally posted by throwaway View Post
    I would like to find some information on the distribution of errors in SOLiD data. I'm planning to use it to simulate a pooling sequencing strategy like the "DNA Sudoku" approach, and assess how badly SOLiD's error rate hurts the capacity to uniquely resolve variants in this scheme.

    If I just assume errors are uniformly distributed along reads with a frequency of 0.03%, I am pretty sure the answer will be "Not much, go for it!" But I suspect that error model is too optimistic, and there are errors which correlate with sequence position and context. Ideally, I'd like to find a paper like "Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing", but for SOLiD rather than Illumina. Is there such a paper?

    Another possibility would be a large corpus of public SOLiD data from loci which have been sequenced by other methods, so I could compare and look for and characterize errors myself.
    You can take a look at the BAMs found here: http://genome.ucla.edu/U87
    They store both the decoded bases as well as the origin color sequences (in the CS tag).

    When you say that the error will be uniform, does that mean the error in the two-base encoded sequence will be uniform? The per-color sequencing error can range from 1-15% from the 5' to the 3' end of the read. After alignment, the base error rate is 0.5-1%.

    Note that sequencing error and base differences are not the same like in Illumina. Sequencing errors may be identified during alignment, and when the two-base encoded sequence is decoded into bases, those identified errors may be corrected (usually this is done simultaneously). Alternatively, sequencing error may occur such that a false SNP is decoded, which would lead to a base difference. Such is the beauty and power of color space.

    Comment

    • drio
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 323

      #3
      Here you have a 50bp Fragment run and the mismatch rate per cycle. Before and after color space corrections:

      -drd

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      10 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      9 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      32 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      40 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...