Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phiS
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 2

    Ovation RNA-Seq kit with SOLiD?

    We're looking for a solution for doing RNA-Seq from precious samples (Trizol-extracted, silica-column-cleaned total RNA from plant material) where less than 1 µg of total RNA is available and there is no chance of ever getting more material. 1 µg total RNA is well below most of the recommendations for library preparations we've seen.

    Do you have any suggestions regarding protocols or kits that have worked well before with low amounts of input RNA?

    In particular, does anyone have experience with NuGen's Ovation RNA-Seq kit for RNA-Seq with SOLiD 4? Are there any pitfalls? Is there anything to look out for specifically? Do the resulting data look good (any bias?) or are there any problems?
  • Erika Feltrin
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 7

    #2
    Ovation RNA-seq kit with SOLiD

    Did you finally used the Ovation kit with SOLiD?
    We are thinking to use it with our SOLiD 5500 machine but do not have any experience about this kit.

    Best Regards
    Erika

    Comment

    • phiS
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2011
      • 2

      #3
      We came to the conclusion that it would likely work, but we didn't go ahead for unrelated reasons, i.e. we never tried it.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...