Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jdmendez
    replied
    Hi, i am doing Clinical Sequencing using Illumina TruSightOne, coupled with Sophia Diagnosis platform. I am in a developing country (Panama), so the challenges are huge!!!

    Looking forward to interact with other experts in Clinical Diagnosis to start interactions, colabs, and any other crazy idea!

    Jorge

    Leave a comment:


  • LSerhGute
    replied
    I realize my question may not have been clear. The reason for my question was that I was hoping to learn two things:

    1.When doing clinical sequencing in the CLIA lab, are you doing targeted or WGS?

    2. Was the sequencing test prescribed by a Dr. to diagnose a disease, and if so, did you lab develop the test?

    Leave a comment:


  • yongbao1
    replied
    we do clinical sequencing

    Leave a comment:


  • LSerhGute
    replied
    When sequencing in the CLIA lab, are you doing proprietary panels used for diagnoses? or is it all still clinical research

    Leave a comment:


  • jp.
    replied
    May you give me answer for the probblem posted here
    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc



    Originally posted by Heisman View Post
    Sorry I did not respond earlier. I am confused. Why do you want to build your own reference genome? What do you mean in your last post when you say you are going for 500 reads? You seem to want to do a lot of different experiments; do you have people around you who you can further discuss this with?

    Leave a comment:


  • jp.
    replied
    Thank you very much for your help, however, may you recommend me something on WGS?

    Originally posted by Heisman View Post
    I think you should start a new thread as I definitely won't be able to help you with RNA-seq stuff. I recommend you read a few reviews on the various experiments you are considering doing so you have a better idea of everything that goes into the data analysis and how to design the experiments.

    Leave a comment:


  • Heisman
    replied
    Originally posted by jp. View Post
    because I think it will be good to detect variants and mutation. Also, I think that this much will be good enough to study SNP and gene expression.
    What are your recommendations for some one who is doing WGS for the first time ?
    what should one study if checking control vs treatment or normal vs diseased ?
    How much should be insert and depth ?
    May I know your opinion, if your guide gives you human samples (control vs treatment, and normal vs diseased) and if you are doing first time WGS ?
    You may please write which may not be perfect but at least to start WGS with ?
    I think you should start a new thread as I definitely won't be able to help you with RNA-seq stuff. I recommend you read a few reviews on the various experiments you are considering doing so you have a better idea of everything that goes into the data analysis and how to design the experiments.

    Leave a comment:


  • jp.
    replied
    because I think it will be good to detect variants and mutation. Also, I think that this much will be good enough to study SNP and gene expression.
    What are your recommendations for some one who is doing WGS for the first time ?
    what should one study if checking control vs treatment or normal vs diseased ?
    How much should be insert and depth ?
    May I know your opinion, if your guide gives you human samples (control vs treatment, and normal vs diseased) and if you are doing first time WGS ?
    You may please write which may not be perfect but at least to start WGS with ?

    Originally posted by Heisman View Post
    I haven't done RNA-seq, hopefully someone else can chime in. Why do you want 500 np inserts?

    Leave a comment:


  • Heisman
    replied
    I haven't done RNA-seq, hopefully someone else can chime in. Why do you want 500 np inserts?

    Leave a comment:


  • jp.
    replied
    Thank Heisman
    As I wrote earlier, I am almost a lone wolf :|
    However, I have changed my plans.
    Now want to detect clinically relevant Variants and might look something common between my my available RNA-seq data and thinking for 500 insert PE.
    Can you please tell me your best strategies, if you were at my place ?
    Thank you


    Originally posted by Heisman View Post
    Sorry I did not respond earlier. I am confused. Why do you want to build your own reference genome? What do you mean in your last post when you say you are going for 500 reads? You seem to want to do a lot of different experiments; do you have people around you who you can further discuss this with?

    Leave a comment:


  • Heisman
    replied
    Sorry I did not respond earlier. I am confused. Why do you want to build your own reference genome? What do you mean in your last post when you say you are going for 500 reads? You seem to want to do a lot of different experiments; do you have people around you who you can further discuss this with?

    Leave a comment:


  • jp.
    replied
    Thank you Heisman
    Finally, I am going with 500 reads with >30X WGS. Is there any suggestion ?



    Originally posted by Heisman View Post
    You need to describe your experiment more fully to get valid answers. Different coverage is required for different applications. If you're trying to call SNPs as either heterozygous or homozygous, you need much less coverage than if you are trying to find mutations present at a frequency of say 5% in a tumor sample. Read length depends on your application too. For example, if you're calling mutations then all else being the same longer reads may be better as they will be easier to align, assuming the quality doesn't tail off too much at the ends. However, if you're doing expression analysis where it is the number of reads that matters moreso than the specific coverage of any given base, longer reads won't help as much (although they may help if you're looking for different isoforms). These might be the reasons people want you to give "something back" to get the answers.

    Leave a comment:


  • jp.
    replied
    Thank you so much for your valuable info. I have studies a bit and wish to ask few more things.
    I wish to sequence whole genome to study SNPs, mutations. I will also use for expression study. I have to sequence transcriptom, So I will do RNA-seq for expression and mutation. I also want to compare the expression data from RNA-seq with Whole Genome Seq. I am thinking to compare this whole genome with hg19 and then compare RNA-seq with hg19 and my whole genome seq. Overall, I will do complete analysis. I also want to build my own reference whole genome which I will use as a hg19 and vice versa.
    1. Do I have to go for two different time sequencing of whole genome with normal coverage and longer and shorter reads ?
    2. I wonder how hg19 is built, the same way I want to built my own. Is it built by sanger.

    Expecting kind reply.
    Thank you.


    Originally posted by Heisman View Post
    You need to describe your experiment more fully to get valid answers. Different coverage is required for different applications. If you're trying to call SNPs as either heterozygous or homozygous, you need ......

    Leave a comment:


  • Heisman
    replied
    Originally posted by jp. View Post
    I thank you for providing kind valuable info. My samples are from human origin Paired-End-HiSeq2000 and I have to pay for reagents cost only because HiSeq2000 is just free to use, in my case, budget is not a problem.
    Therefore, I like to ask few more question;
    1. How many replicates are required for whole genome sequencing ?
    I am thinking to go for 3 biological replicates + 3 technical replicates per sample i.e. 1 samples = (1 x 3) 3 = 9. Is it enough ? or I should increase the replicates ?
    2. What is the best depth coverage, 30X or more ?
    3. How can I increase depth coverage ?
    4. What is best library size, 150 or 250 or higher?
    5. Can I use single-cell DNA/RNA on Paired-End-HiSeq2000 ?
    Thank you very much in advance
    (I am sorry for asking very preliminary question here but nobody answers my question, every body want something back to give me the answers or just said, figure it out. There is nobody in my location to help/guide a beginner).
    You need to describe your experiment more fully to get valid answers. Different coverage is required for different applications. If you're trying to call SNPs as either heterozygous or homozygous, you need much less coverage than if you are trying to find mutations present at a frequency of say 5% in a tumor sample. Read length depends on your application too. For example, if you're calling mutations then all else being the same longer reads may be better as they will be easier to align, assuming the quality doesn't tail off too much at the ends. However, if you're doing expression analysis where it is the number of reads that matters moreso than the specific coverage of any given base, longer reads won't help as much (although they may help if you're looking for different isoforms). These might be the reasons people want you to give "something back" to get the answers.

    Leave a comment:


  • jp.
    replied
    I thank you for providing kind valuable info. My samples are from human origin Paired-End-HiSeq2000 and I have to pay for reagents cost only because HiSeq2000 is just free to use, in my case, budget is not a problem.
    Therefore, I like to ask few more question;
    1. How many replicates are required for whole genome sequencing ?
    I am thinking to go for 3 biological replicates + 3 technical replicates per sample i.e. 1 samples = (1 x 3) 3 = 9. Is it enough ? or I should increase the replicates ?
    2. What is the best depth coverage, 30X or more ?
    3. How can I increase depth coverage ?
    4. What is best library size, 150 or 250 or higher?
    5. Can I use single-cell DNA/RNA on Paired-End-HiSeq2000 ?
    Thank you very much in advance
    (I am sorry for asking very preliminary question here but nobody answers my question, every body want something back to give me the answers or just said, figure it out. There is nobody in my location to help/guide a beginner).

    Leave a comment:

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Recent Developments in Metagenomics
    by seqadmin





    Metagenomics has improved the way researchers study microorganisms across diverse environments. Historically, studying microorganisms relied on culturing them in the lab, a method that limits the investigation of many species since most are unculturable1. Metagenomics overcomes these issues by allowing the study of microorganisms regardless of their ability to be cultured or the environments they inhabit. Over time, the field has evolved, especially with the advent...
    09-23-2024, 06:35 AM
  • seqadmin
    Understanding Genetic Influence on Infectious Disease
    by seqadmin




    During the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists observed that while some individuals experienced severe illness when infected with SARS-CoV-2, others were barely affected. These disparities left researchers and clinicians wondering what causes the wide variations in response to viral infections and what role genetics plays.

    Jean-Laurent Casanova, M.D., Ph.D., Professor at Rockefeller University, is a leading expert in this crossover between genetics and infectious...
    09-09-2024, 10:59 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
0 responses
13 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 09-30-2024, 08:33 AM
0 responses
25 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 09-26-2024, 12:57 PM
0 responses
18 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X