what is average number of missense/nonsense per Mb of coding DNA? I found 500 variants/Mb but that includes also synonimous.
-
-
Please don't post the same question in multiple forums. That may not necessarily increase your chances of getting an answer.
As for your question: That is going to be dependent on the genome etc. I don't think there can be a single answer.Last edited by GenoMax; 01-08-2016, 10:24 AM. -
Yes, that sounds about right from the known human SNPs. That said, GenoMax is correct in that it will depend on the genome.Originally posted by vasvale View PostComment
-
I am looking for average in human genomes, could not find info on exomes papersComment
-
For the human genome I use 1/100 in the non-coding regions and 1/1000 in the coding regions. Per individual of course. This tends to be roughly true. But it will differ between non coding regions and between genes.Comment
-
CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).
Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into...07-31-2026, 11:01 AM -
Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.
The systematic characterization of the human proteome has...07-20-2026, 11:48 AM -
Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
Comment