Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DESeq: question about with replicates and without any replicates.

    hi
    I have 4 samples, A1,A2,B1,B2.
    two conditions:A,B. each conditions have two replicates.

    when I feed the reads count to the DESeq with replicates and without any replicates, the results vary greatly.

    1.With replicates(A1A2-VS-B1B2), I get about 12000 DEGs(padj<0.1).
    2.Without any replicates(A1-VS-B1), I get about only 200 DEGs(padj<0.1).

    Both of the MA-plot are attached.

    When working without any replicates, it sames that many informations are lossed, even the fold change is very high. Such as the gene "23416":

    HTML Code:
    "id"	"baseMean"	"baseMeanA"	"baseMeanB"	"foldChange"	"log2FoldChange"	"pval"	"padj"
    "without replicates"	292.791254092328	9.3250242940964	576.25748389056	61.7968882135121	5.94946228783961	0.0039474188223427	0.179640885315504
    "with replicates" 285.324742802128        12.0227636114328        558.626721992823        46.4640859661922        5.53804412255897        5.31049903576043e-59    6.44978249349437e-58
    how to explain this?

    PS:
    HTML Code:
    head(countsTable)
    gene	A1	A2	B1	B2
    57573	104	67	233	224
    8563	357	346	110	104
    8434	88	94	94	120
    10309	33	23	11	14
    7652	17	16	1	0
    HTML Code:
    #With replicates
    countsTable <- read.delim("A1A2B1B2",header=TRUE, stringsAsFactors=TRUE, row.names="gene")
    conds <- factor(c( "A", "A","B","B"))
    cds <- newCountDataSet( countsTable, conds )
    cds <- estimateSizeFactors( cds, locfunc=shorth )
    cds <- estimateDispersions( cds )
    res <- nbinomTest( cds, "A", "B" )
    HTML Code:
    #Without any replicates
    cds11 <- cds[,c("A1","B1")]
    cds11 <- estimateDispersions(cds,method="blind", fitType ="local",sharingMode="fit-only") #is right here?
    res112 <- nbinomTest(cds112,"A","B")
    Attached Files
    Last edited by nb509; 10-25-2011, 04:32 AM.

  • #3
    I'm not sure what your question is.

    Of course you hardly get any usable results without replicates. This is, after all, why it is so important to have them.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
    • seqadmin
      Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
      by seqadmin


      Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
      03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    17 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    22 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
    0 responses
    46 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X