Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chris k
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2014
    • 1

    Help with trinity differential expression

    Dear seqanswers users,

    I am working with RNAseq data from a Illumina HiSeq and I like to perform a comparative analysis using trinity embedded perl scripts with edgeR. The RNA was prepped as TrueSeq library (newest version whatever that is right now).

    To do that I need a estimation of the abundance of HiSeq reads in comparison to the reference transcriptome (which I created ab-initio using trinity version 2014/07/17). For this approach I use bowtie2 (version 2.2.3
    64-bit) for the inital mapping step and samtools (version 0.2.0-rc12-1-gbbe85a9, 64bit self-compiled).

    During a follow-up step the script from trinity/util "rsem-run-em" is used which throws the following error:

    rsem-run-em: QualDist.h:39: int QualDist::c2q(char): Assertion `c >= 33 && c <= 126' failed.

    of course that error infers that some sequences in my 22Gb reads have quality scores which are out of the range of ASCII dec 33 (equalling !) to 126 (equalling ~). By simple grep analysis for non-ASCII characters between 33 to 126 I could not get any lines out of the fastq read files which would contain such "illegal" characters. Form that I infer the problem lies within the bam files I got from bowtie2.

    So, I used samtools with the following command to get rid of all lines which would not have acceptable quality-scores for the phred33 quality column in the bam file by using the following command:

    samtools view -bq 2 bowtie2.bam > bowtie2.filtered.bam

    But still the same error persists.

    So to my question: Does anybody have a clue how one could identify the single "wrong" entry in a 2,3Gb bam file to get rid of low quality sequence entries with illegal characters?

    Any help is highly appreciated.

    Chris

    PS: For further information I run a i5 intel machine (64bit) and use ubuntu 14.04 LTS.
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Perhaps there's a space or extraneous line ending somewhere. If you're familiar with running things in a debugger, you might be able to diagnose the cause that way. If not, you can always subset the file to determine exactly where the problem line/character is (this can become very time consuming).

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      Yesterday, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    52 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    111 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...