Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Line
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 3

    problems visualizing bam files in IGV

    Hello,

    I am aligning RNA-seq data using Bowtie and when I tried to visualize the bam file in IGV, everything is fine except that there are not reads in chrX and chrY. However I have coverage of these chrs because I use the same file for running Cufflinks and I get gene expression in those chrs. I have also checked the hg18.fa.fai which I used for indexing my bam file, and both chrs are included.

    Have someone any idea what could be the problem?

    Thanks
  • Simon Anders
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 995

    #2
    Check that the chromosome names are the same in your genome file (as displayed in the drop-down box that allows you to select the chromosome to display in IGV) and in your BAM file (check with 'samtools view'). If it is called, say, 'X' in IGV and 'chrX' in the BAM file, it won't work.

    If the names don't match, or if the sex chromosomes are completely missing from the drop-down box, make a new genome file with the "Import Genome" function of IGV, using your genome FASTA file and a corresponding GTF file.

    Comment

    • Line
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2010
      • 3

      #3
      Thanks,

      I checked it and found that I needed to sort my .bam file and then indexing the sorted.bam file. Now is working!

      Comment

      • kaps
        Member
        • Jan 2015
        • 71

        #4
        Dear all,
        I have used bowtie2 to align paired – end illumina reads from cowpea and generated bam files. my next task is to visualise the alignments using igv. how do i proceed without a cowpea enome. My interest is to find out the proportion of reads a matching each of the virus hits.
        I am working on a server.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...