Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aquila
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 6

    Normalization: DESeq vs. EdgeR with method="RLE"

    Hello all,

    I am trying out different normalization methods for RNA-seq.
    The newest release of EdgeR offers (among others) a normalization method called "RLE" that is supposed to be an implementation of what is also implemented in DESeq. This is explained in the edgeR manual. See ?calcNormFactors.

    I thus expected to obtain the same normalization factors with both packages.
    I am using part of the MAQC-2 data set that is referenced in a number of papers on RNA-seq. There are 14 samples, of which 7 are brain and 7 are UHR.

    Here's what I tried:


    "countsMatrix" is a matrix of raw counts (one column for each sample)
    conds <- c( rep("brain", 7), rep("UHR", 7))

    a)
    cds <- newCountDataSet( countsMatrix, conds )
    cds <- estimateSizeFactors( cds )
    sizeFactors(cds)

    b)
    d <- DGEList(counts=countsMatrix, group=conds, lib.size=colSums(countsTable))
    d <- calcNormFactors(d, method="RLE")
    d$samples$norm.factors


    Results:
    a)
    1.1430 1.1597 1.1695 1.1707 1.1751 0.3293 1.1643 1.1489 1.1650 1.1781 1.1802 0.4877 1.1617 1.1596

    b)
    1.0546 1.0354 1.0167 1.0291 1.0178 0.7133 1.0330 1.0645 1.0705 1.0876 1.0837 0.7619 1.0796 1.0564


    Might anyone have a suggestion why the resulting normalization factors are different?
  • Jouneau Luc
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 2

    #2
    Hello aquila,

    would you please tell me where did you download this MAQC dataset ?

    Thanks in advance

    Luc

    Comment

    • aquila
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 6

      #3
      The data is available on


      Search for: SRA010153

      There are several data sets there. I downloaded the following:

      SRX016368 (7 samples)
      SRX016366 (7 samples)


      I found these data sets referenced in the following publication (among others):
      Bullard et al, Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments, BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:94.

      Comment

      • ning
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 4

        #4
        Hi aquila




        For edgeR, I guess you need to multiply the output of calcNormFactors() by the library size to get the "normalization factor"?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...