Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BTS
    Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 19

    Caliper GX

    Greetings,

    We're looking into purchasing a Caliper GX I or II. It's application would be mainly as a substitute to manual gel running but would also be used in some Next Gen library prep steps. Does anyone have any experience with these instruments and how well they work? Thanks in advance.
  • TonyBrooks
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 303

    #2
    Originally posted by nightfly
    Have you ever looked for a <gizmo> from <company>?
    This one is full automated and has much lower sample costs.
    We are very happy with it.
    I don't think the Fragment Analyzer has the ability to size select like the Calipers do. If you contact Caliper, we found them open to coming in a demo-ing in the lab on a few of your samples.

    Comment

    • ECO
      --Site Admin--
      • Oct 2007
      • 1360

      #3
      Removed nightfly's post and edited the quote as he was clearly posting an advertisement. Apologies for not catching it faster.

      Comment

      • 454newbie
        Member
        • Jun 2009
        • 17

        #4
        We have been using a caliper GX for the last 18 months, mainly for routine analysis of PCR products and sequencing libraries. Performance in our hands is basically equivalent to the Agilent bioanalyzer, but with the advantage of throughput. We still use the bioanalyzer for experiments with <24 samples, and for high-sensitivity apps. We had a few problems with the machine initially, but these were fixed quickly. It now runs pretty much solidly 3-4 days a week, and has done without problem for at least 9 months.
        hope this helps

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...