Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Smriti
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 40

    Qubit library quantitation variations

    Hi All,

    I am facing lot of variations in my library quantitation using Qubit dsDNA BR assay kit. Lambda DNA stock concentration which is provided by Sigma has a documented concentration of 400ng/ul and Qubit shows above 550ng/ul. What might be the root cause? Is it pipetting error or people tend to get variations from sample to sample?

    Please advise!
  • Gina_P
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 20

    #2
    Hi, it could be pipetting errors, but more likely you simply have a bit of batch variation from Sigma so that it's not exactly 400 ng/uL. However, I don't have any experience with these stocks so anyone else can comment if they know.
    - Gina

    Comment

    • lterhune
      Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 19

      #3
      Hi,

      In our experience the Qubit BR assay is less accurate than the HS assay, so try doing a dilution of your DNA and using the HS kit if you have it. Our BR assay usually read higher than the HS, even if the stock DNA concentration fell within the range of both.

      One QC thing we've started is doing a spec of your Qubit standards, especially standard 2. We had one kit with problems and found it was almost 20% above the concentration written on the tube.

      Also mix your samples extremely well, this can make a huge difference especially if you're only measuring 1ul.


      -Liz

      Comment

      • mmmm
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 131

        #4
        Qubit (HS, BR)

        when I used Qubit HS (high senstivity kit) for measuring gDNA conc., I got entirely different concentation compared to BR (broad range) kit. do you know, what is the difference between Qubit HS kit and Qubit BR kit for DNA conc.?

        Comment

        • chevrm
          Member
          • Apr 2012
          • 14

          #5
          When was the last time you ran the standards? If you're not running them every time then you're pretty susceptible to pipetting errors in your Q-reagent/buffer sln.

          Comment

          • mmmm
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2013
            • 131

            #6
            I run the standard everytime and Qubit reads the right conc. for the standard but I got different readings for the same sample (20ng/Ml when HS kit was used) and (80ng/Ml when BR kit was used), have tried on other samples too and get different readings- it is not pipeeting errors so what is the explanation?

            Also, would DNA concentration decrease that much following freezing and thawing?

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            30 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            213 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            79 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...