Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Smriti
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 40

    Qubit library quantitation variations

    Hi All,

    I am facing lot of variations in my library quantitation using Qubit dsDNA BR assay kit. Lambda DNA stock concentration which is provided by Sigma has a documented concentration of 400ng/ul and Qubit shows above 550ng/ul. What might be the root cause? Is it pipetting error or people tend to get variations from sample to sample?

    Please advise!
  • Gina_P
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 20

    #2
    Hi, it could be pipetting errors, but more likely you simply have a bit of batch variation from Sigma so that it's not exactly 400 ng/uL. However, I don't have any experience with these stocks so anyone else can comment if they know.
    - Gina

    Comment

    • lterhune
      Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 19

      #3
      Hi,

      In our experience the Qubit BR assay is less accurate than the HS assay, so try doing a dilution of your DNA and using the HS kit if you have it. Our BR assay usually read higher than the HS, even if the stock DNA concentration fell within the range of both.

      One QC thing we've started is doing a spec of your Qubit standards, especially standard 2. We had one kit with problems and found it was almost 20% above the concentration written on the tube.

      Also mix your samples extremely well, this can make a huge difference especially if you're only measuring 1ul.


      -Liz

      Comment

      • mmmm
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 131

        #4
        Qubit (HS, BR)

        when I used Qubit HS (high senstivity kit) for measuring gDNA conc., I got entirely different concentation compared to BR (broad range) kit. do you know, what is the difference between Qubit HS kit and Qubit BR kit for DNA conc.?

        Comment

        • chevrm
          Member
          • Apr 2012
          • 14

          #5
          When was the last time you ran the standards? If you're not running them every time then you're pretty susceptible to pipetting errors in your Q-reagent/buffer sln.

          Comment

          • mmmm
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2013
            • 131

            #6
            I run the standard everytime and Qubit reads the right conc. for the standard but I got different readings for the same sample (20ng/Ml when HS kit was used) and (80ng/Ml when BR kit was used), have tried on other samples too and get different readings- it is not pipeeting errors so what is the explanation?

            Also, would DNA concentration decrease that much following freezing and thawing?

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              Today, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
              by SEQadmin2


              With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


              Introduction

              Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
              05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
            0 responses
            49 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...