Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Claire1
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 6

    directional mRNA-Seq Sample Preparation

    Hello,

    I want to start to work on directional mRNA-Seq Sample Preparation.
    I would like to know if anybody has experience with the Illumina protocol -directional mRNA-Seq Sample Preparation- and/or the protocol from epicentre -ScriptSeq™ mRNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit-.
    In your experience which one gives you the best result.
    Any suggestions are very welcome.
    thanks!
  • Garyron
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 10

    #2
    Hi Claire1,
    Have you decided on the kit , I just saw your post and illumina's directional protocol needs items part # from two kits as well as a fragmentation buffer but it works very well.
    Bests

    Comment

    • epistatic
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 129

      #3
      The Illumina protocol using multiple kits is expensive and I found the Epicentre protocol to be annoying for small sample numbers and not scalable for larger sample numbers. The Epicentre method has one long t-cycling program with wait times, pauses, + 1 ul to every tube multiple times. It is quick though (I could do libraries in one day) but I found painful.

      I now use the Illumina mRNA TruSeq kit with modifications and it works very well.

      I take the sample through the TruSeq kit per protocol through 1st strand. After 1st strand I clean up the sample with Zymo's RNA C&C -5 to remove dNTPs. I then do 2nd strand with a dNTP mix with dUTP (U, C, G, A) and NEB's dNTP-free 2nd Strand reaction buffer and 2nd Strand RNA-seq module. The resultant cDNA is taken back into the TruSeq kit until right before PCR. At this point you can treat the sample with USER and then go into PCR, or go directly into PCR (The kit taq looks to choke on dUTP strand, USER step likely not needed). This has been used on 100+ samples in my lab and works well.

      Comment

      • Claire1
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 6

        #4
        Hello,
        thanks for your replies!

        I decided for the kit from epicentre. Before the Sample Prep I was doing a rRNA removal with the Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal Kit. Both protocols were easy to follow, fast and were working fine. Indeed the steps to pipete 1ul individually is not setted up for larger sample numbers, but this will be not a problem for us. Now we are waiting for the sequencing results.

        Very interesting your modified mRNA TruSeq protocol. With USER do you mean UNG treatment ?

        Thanks!

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          Today, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          Yesterday, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        8 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        31 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...