Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • moedog45
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 4

    #1

    DNA loss on Bioanalyzer

    About two weeks ago I sheared some gDNA samples on the Covaris E210 and purified them with AMPure beads, as instructed by the SureSelect XT protocol. I measured the samples on the Bioanalyzer 2100 immediately following clean-up and received good peaks at the right area. However, I re-measured the samples as a positive control and I see that even though the peaks are still present for my sample, they are much shorter and it appears I have lost some gDNA.

    My first instinct is to consider this nuclease contamination, but if this were the case, wouldn't I not see any evidence of DNA on the Bioanalyzer? I'm also wondering if I lost DNA following the freeze-thaw cycle the samples underwent, for they were stored at -20 degrees Celsius. Does anyone else have any ideas about what could be causing this DNA loss, as well as any suggestions about how I should prevent it? Thanks!
  • ECO
    --Site Admin--
    • Oct 2007
    • 1360

    #2
    What's the original sample source (organism and if applicable, tissue) and purification method? How much shorter is shorter? Did the whole peak move

    Nuclease contamination is a possibility. Freeze-thaw problems are very unlikely in my experience, especially if you're observing a dramatic change in sample quality from a single cycle.

    I always suspect the Bioanalyzer. =] Any quantitation method that relies on pipetting of 1ul is by definition a ballpark method (unless you run several dilutions/reps etc).

    Comment

    • moedog45
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 4

      #3
      The original source was tissue, and the DNA was purified with Agencourt AMPure XP magnetic beads. The peak is shorter by about 15 fluorescence units, but the peak itself did not move.

      I talked to tech support about this and they told me if there is only one visible peak and the peak size hasn't moved to a smaller size range, then I shouldn't worry about nuclease contamination. Tech support then validated your opinion, ECO, and said it was likely discrepancy between the two reads. I guess storing nucleic material in water for a long time rather than a buffer makes me a bit queasy.

      Thanks for the feedback!

      Comment

      • vtosha
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 36

        #4
        Do you measure concentration of your samples with another technics? Bioanalyzer not reliable for measuring of concentration.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        17 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        42 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...