Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hbt
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 20

    RIN vs Volume?

    I have a set of RNA samples prepared for RNAseq, however the RIN values and total volume on a few of the samples are less than ideal (<7.0 RIN and ~1.5ug total RNA) per sample

    I have now produced a second set of samples (direct biological repeat) with much better RIN values (~8.6) but still low volume of total RNA.

    My question is whether I would get a better set of results by combining the two samples, thereby reducing the RIN value to and average of the two samples but providing the sequencing centre with a much greater volume of RNA to library prep from? (and presumable reducing the number of duplicates). Or do I just have the second set of samples sequenced as they are the best quality samples I have available?

    In other words, which has a greater affect on the quality, coverage level and level of duplicates of the dataset? RIN value or total volume?

    The first set of samples also had some poor 260/230 ratio values, does this have much affect on the RNAseq chemistry and could it compromise the quality of the results further?

    The samples are to sequenced (single end 50bp) on 1/3 of an illumina Hiseq2000 lane each, following RiboMinus treatment

    any thoughts would be greatly appreciated

    Thank you
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    Originally posted by hbt View Post

    The first set of samples also had some poor 260/230 ratio values, does this have much affect on the RNAseq chemistry and could it compromise the quality of the results further?

    The samples are to sequenced (single end 50bp) on 1/3 of an illumina Hiseq2000 lane each, following RiboMinus treatment

    any thoughts would be greatly appreciated

    Thank you
    Are you constructing the libraries?

    RiboMinus depletes degraded rRNA poorly. Why not use RiboZero?
    As long as you have a good insertion point into your protocol, then slightly degraded RNA will work fine if you RiboZero deplete. But you don't want to do a polyA+ purification as well.

    260/230 is a measurement of the relative absorbance of your DNA (260) against other stuff capable of absorbing at 230 nm. That would include acetic acid or salts of acetate or the shoulder from a guanidinium salt. Other than the effect of the salt itself on hybridization of ribo depletion oligos to your sample rRNA, neither of these should have much effect on this step. After ribo depletion, you will desalt your sample anyway. (Use a Zymo column, not ethanol precipitation or that wretched Invitrogen "concentration" device.)

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
      by SEQadmin2


      Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


      The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
      ...
      06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    36 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
    0 responses
    100 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
    0 responses
    120 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
    0 responses
    113 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...