Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mpalermo
    Junior Member
    • May 2012
    • 3

    Second peak on Agilent HS DNA Chip Trace

    Hi All,

    We've been attempting to create an RNA-Seq Library using a Nugen NGS Target prep. The samples are PCR amplified for 15 cycles and cleaned using a Qiagen Gel Band Extraction kit. The samples were run on an Agilent HS DNA chip and we noticed an additional peak following the sample peak around 1000bp. A second gel band extraction was performed and a follow-up HS DNA chip was run...the peaks were still there! We then tried denaturing the samples at 96C for 2 minutes, but it only made the peaks worse.

    We've been told that the second peak can be caused by too many PCR cycles - is this what anyone else has found? Has anyone else experienced this/have some insight?

    Thank you!

    AGTC Staff
    Attached Files
  • pbluescript
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 224

    #2
    It is too much PCR. Have a look at one of my previous posts:

    Techniques and protocol discussions on sample preparation, library generation, methods and ideas


    This thread in general should answer your questions.

    Comment

    • mpalermo
      Junior Member
      • May 2012
      • 3

      #3
      Very helpful, thanks!

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        Originally posted by mpalermo View Post
        Hi All,
        [...] We then tried denaturing the samples at 96C for 2 minutes, but it only made the peaks worse.

        We've been told that the second peak can be caused by too many PCR cycles - is this what anyone else has found? Has anyone else experienced this/have some insight?

        Thank you!

        AGTC Staff
        Actually had not seen a double peak post for a while. Almost a feeling of nostalgia...

        Note that your denaturation/renaturation result strongly supports the "bubble product" hypothesis over my "daisy chain" hypothesis. That is, the inserts all have the same sequences flanking them. Thus, kinetically, the most likely outcome are two unrelated library molecules annealing together at their adapters creating a "bubble" in the middle of the amplicon where the unrelated inserts will not anneal.

        As to why that would run slower than a completely anneal amplicon of the same length, I have no idea. Or at least for agarose gel electrophoresis, I have no idea. I am pretty sure that single stranded molecules tend to run more slowly on BioAnalyzer chips than double stranded molecule of the same length. So the single stranded region in the middle of the amplicon would tend to cause it to run slower.

        But as you probably saw in the other thread, pbluescript shows the double peak phenomenon on agarose gels as well.

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        • riehle
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2012
          • 7

          #5
          Hi!
          I came across the same problem, you were describing in your thread when preparing ChIP-Seq libraries.
          What I dont understand is why can't you get rid of this second peak when doing gel out? I cut a 200-300 bp fraction as well as a 300-400 fraction, still when analyzing my library on the Bioanalyzer I see a second peak around 1000 bp.
          Can you or someone explain that to me.
          Thanxx



          Originally posted by mpalermo View Post
          Hi All,

          We've been attempting to create an RNA-Seq Library using a Nugen NGS Target prep. The samples are PCR amplified for 15 cycles and cleaned using a Qiagen Gel Band Extraction kit. The samples were run on an Agilent HS DNA chip and we noticed an additional peak following the sample peak around 1000bp. A second gel band extraction was performed and a follow-up HS DNA chip was run...the peaks were still there! We then tried denaturing the samples at 96C for 2 minutes, but it only made the peaks worse.

          We've been told that the second peak can be caused by too many PCR cycles - is this what anyone else has found? Has anyone else experienced this/have some insight?

          Thank you!

          AGTC Staff

          Comment

          • pmiguel
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 2328

            #6
            Originally posted by riehle View Post
            Hi!
            I came across the same problem, you were describing in your thread when preparing ChIP-Seq libraries.
            What I dont understand is why can't you get rid of this second peak when doing gel out? I cut a 200-300 bp fraction as well as a 300-400 fraction, still when analyzing my library on the Bioanalyzer I see a second peak around 1000 bp.
            Can you or someone explain that to me.
            Thanxx
            If you unintentionally strand-denature your amplicons during isolation from agarose, when they re-anneal, the statistically favored produce will be a bubble product. Bubble products can run at nearly 2x the apparent size of completely double stranded products of the same length. At least on Agilent chips.

            During purification of your DNA from agarose, did you use a heating step?

            If so, most likely that is the cause.

            I should warn you that this double peaking phenomenon is more a curiosity or an annoyance than a real problem. So burning a lot of time on it is probably not warranted.

            --
            Phillip

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            100 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            121 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
            0 responses
            114 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...