Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mpalermo
    Junior Member
    • May 2012
    • 3

    #1

    Second peak on Agilent HS DNA Chip Trace

    Hi All,

    We've been attempting to create an RNA-Seq Library using a Nugen NGS Target prep. The samples are PCR amplified for 15 cycles and cleaned using a Qiagen Gel Band Extraction kit. The samples were run on an Agilent HS DNA chip and we noticed an additional peak following the sample peak around 1000bp. A second gel band extraction was performed and a follow-up HS DNA chip was run...the peaks were still there! We then tried denaturing the samples at 96C for 2 minutes, but it only made the peaks worse.

    We've been told that the second peak can be caused by too many PCR cycles - is this what anyone else has found? Has anyone else experienced this/have some insight?

    Thank you!

    AGTC Staff
    Attached Files
  • pbluescript
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 224

    #2
    It is too much PCR. Have a look at one of my previous posts:

    Techniques and protocol discussions on sample preparation, library generation, methods and ideas


    This thread in general should answer your questions.

    Comment

    • mpalermo
      Junior Member
      • May 2012
      • 3

      #3
      Very helpful, thanks!

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        Originally posted by mpalermo View Post
        Hi All,
        [...] We then tried denaturing the samples at 96C for 2 minutes, but it only made the peaks worse.

        We've been told that the second peak can be caused by too many PCR cycles - is this what anyone else has found? Has anyone else experienced this/have some insight?

        Thank you!

        AGTC Staff
        Actually had not seen a double peak post for a while. Almost a feeling of nostalgia...

        Note that your denaturation/renaturation result strongly supports the "bubble product" hypothesis over my "daisy chain" hypothesis. That is, the inserts all have the same sequences flanking them. Thus, kinetically, the most likely outcome are two unrelated library molecules annealing together at their adapters creating a "bubble" in the middle of the amplicon where the unrelated inserts will not anneal.

        As to why that would run slower than a completely anneal amplicon of the same length, I have no idea. Or at least for agarose gel electrophoresis, I have no idea. I am pretty sure that single stranded molecules tend to run more slowly on BioAnalyzer chips than double stranded molecule of the same length. So the single stranded region in the middle of the amplicon would tend to cause it to run slower.

        But as you probably saw in the other thread, pbluescript shows the double peak phenomenon on agarose gels as well.

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        • riehle
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2012
          • 7

          #5
          Hi!
          I came across the same problem, you were describing in your thread when preparing ChIP-Seq libraries.
          What I dont understand is why can't you get rid of this second peak when doing gel out? I cut a 200-300 bp fraction as well as a 300-400 fraction, still when analyzing my library on the Bioanalyzer I see a second peak around 1000 bp.
          Can you or someone explain that to me.
          Thanxx



          Originally posted by mpalermo View Post
          Hi All,

          We've been attempting to create an RNA-Seq Library using a Nugen NGS Target prep. The samples are PCR amplified for 15 cycles and cleaned using a Qiagen Gel Band Extraction kit. The samples were run on an Agilent HS DNA chip and we noticed an additional peak following the sample peak around 1000bp. A second gel band extraction was performed and a follow-up HS DNA chip was run...the peaks were still there! We then tried denaturing the samples at 96C for 2 minutes, but it only made the peaks worse.

          We've been told that the second peak can be caused by too many PCR cycles - is this what anyone else has found? Has anyone else experienced this/have some insight?

          Thank you!

          AGTC Staff

          Comment

          • pmiguel
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 2328

            #6
            Originally posted by riehle View Post
            Hi!
            I came across the same problem, you were describing in your thread when preparing ChIP-Seq libraries.
            What I dont understand is why can't you get rid of this second peak when doing gel out? I cut a 200-300 bp fraction as well as a 300-400 fraction, still when analyzing my library on the Bioanalyzer I see a second peak around 1000 bp.
            Can you or someone explain that to me.
            Thanxx
            If you unintentionally strand-denature your amplicons during isolation from agarose, when they re-anneal, the statistically favored produce will be a bubble product. Bubble products can run at nearly 2x the apparent size of completely double stranded products of the same length. At least on Agilent chips.

            During purification of your DNA from agarose, did you use a heating step?

            If so, most likely that is the cause.

            I should warn you that this double peaking phenomenon is more a curiosity or an annoyance than a real problem. So burning a lot of time on it is probably not warranted.

            --
            Phillip

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
              by SEQadmin2



              CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

              Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
              ...
              07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 07:41 AM
            0 responses
            9 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
            0 responses
            25 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
            0 responses
            38 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            25 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...