Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • smallcreek
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 4

    #16
    Hi guys,
    I am happy to read your valuable discussion here. We recently had problem that the color balance of the sequencing is completely off, which caused majority of image pannel failed. On the WFA, every parameter looks fine except P2_Gain is too low (lower than 8). Is that color balance off is caused by the concatamerization of adaptors? We did not know this trick and did not dilute the adaptors while our ChIP DNA concentration is very low. If the P2_gain is a result of adaptor concatamerization, we can use it to titrate the adaptor dilution based on the concentration of ChIP Seq samples from our customers.

    Thanks in advance

    Thanks in advance.

    Smallcreek

    Comment

    • rmetz
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 4

      #17
      Originally posted by Nix View Post
      Did you by chance use salmon sperm or another DNA as a block or carrier during the chIP?

      (We've had 2 separate groups who did just this. Leads to very low % alignment. Uggg! On the other hand were up to 100million salmon reads if anyone wants to take a go at a denovo assembly.)
      Has anyone else had this problem?

      Comment

      • Hamid
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 108

        #18
        Hi Elly,

        Shearing to a specific size range does not necessarily correspond to efficient IP. Often people expose their chromatin to too much energy which provides great shearing results at the expense of epitope integrity. I would suggest that you carry out a western of your sheared material with the same antibody you are using for your IP. It is a cheaper and an effective method of QC for ChIP. We routinely do that in our lab, and the results correlates very well with our IP. You can also carry out qPCR with epitope specific primers.

        Thank you

        Hamid

        Comment

        • captainentropy
          Member
          • Mar 2009
          • 89

          #19
          Did you (elly) run your libraries on a bionalayzer? If your library is mostly amplified adapters then what you observe is exactly what you would expect. A bioanalyzer trace would very clearly indicate this with a strong peak in the 124bp range.

          And if you have access to an instrument like a Pippin Prep or a LabChip XT then you should use that. It will pretty much eliminate adapter contamination prior to the PCR step (assuming you aren't size selecting below say 150bp).

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 07:41 AM
          0 responses
          12 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          38 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...