Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Snf5
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 2

    #1

    Size variation for multiplexing

    Hi friends,

    I prepared mulitplexing libraries for ChIP-Seq of a histone marker in different cell types. I used sonication as the chromatin shearing method and used the Truseq adaptors for generating the libraries. However, the size distribution of the libraries I made varied from one to the other with a maximum difference of about 40bp (bioanalyzer image attached). Could anyone here give me some suggestion as whether this would affect the outcome of the experiment? What would be a decent size difference to expect when doing multiplexing? I also found that the input samples tend to have more such variations.

    Many thanks.

    PingClick image for larger version

Name:	bioanalyzerimage.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	67.4 KB
ID:	307903
    Last edited by Snf5; 09-09-2012, 06:33 AM. Reason: I found that my pdf attachment may be blocked
  • arolfe
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 29

    #2
    Variation in the fragment size between different transcription factors or histone markers is normal and I don't think I've ever seen a problem as a result of the magnitude change that you observe.

    Your case is a little different, since it's all the same marker. I assume you're testing a set of conditions over which you expect to see some changes (more or less of the marker, or different targets), so it's not surprising to see some change in the size fragments you get. If these were my samples, I'd probably go ahead and sequence them. However, I'd do some extra analysis to see whether parameters in the analysis software correlate with the fragment sizes- eg, does setting a smaller or larger window for enrichment matter? If so, you'll need to think about how to account for that if you're doing overlap statistics between conditions.

    Alex

    Comment

    • Snf5
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 2

      #3
      Hi Alex,

      Thank you very much for your advice. Really appreciated it.

      Ping

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
      0 responses
      28 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...