Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Snf5
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 2

    Size variation for multiplexing

    Hi friends,

    I prepared mulitplexing libraries for ChIP-Seq of a histone marker in different cell types. I used sonication as the chromatin shearing method and used the Truseq adaptors for generating the libraries. However, the size distribution of the libraries I made varied from one to the other with a maximum difference of about 40bp (bioanalyzer image attached). Could anyone here give me some suggestion as whether this would affect the outcome of the experiment? What would be a decent size difference to expect when doing multiplexing? I also found that the input samples tend to have more such variations.

    Many thanks.

    PingClick image for larger version

Name:	bioanalyzerimage.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	67.4 KB
ID:	307903
    Last edited by Snf5; 09-09-2012, 06:33 AM. Reason: I found that my pdf attachment may be blocked
  • arolfe
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 29

    #2
    Variation in the fragment size between different transcription factors or histone markers is normal and I don't think I've ever seen a problem as a result of the magnitude change that you observe.

    Your case is a little different, since it's all the same marker. I assume you're testing a set of conditions over which you expect to see some changes (more or less of the marker, or different targets), so it's not surprising to see some change in the size fragments you get. If these were my samples, I'd probably go ahead and sequence them. However, I'd do some extra analysis to see whether parameters in the analysis software correlate with the fragment sizes- eg, does setting a smaller or larger window for enrichment matter? If so, you'll need to think about how to account for that if you're doing overlap statistics between conditions.

    Alex

    Comment

    • Snf5
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 2

      #3
      Hi Alex,

      Thank you very much for your advice. Really appreciated it.

      Ping

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      43 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      49 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...