Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • osl
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 7

    Cloudy eluates with AMPure XP beads?

    Hi all,

    I was trying to pool my ChIP DNAs into one for library construction using the AMPure XP beads (300 ul sample + 1.6x beads).
    However, after adding 31 ul of TE for elution, I recovered around 37 ul AND it looks a bit cloudy.
    I did try repeating the XP purification once more (37 ul of eluates + 1.6x beads) but got similar results.
    I suspect the cloudiness is from the PEG-containing buffer of the beads, which somehow hasn't been efficiently removed.

    My main question is whether this "cloudiness" would interfere with later steps in library prep (next step would be Ends Repair) or it'd be better to remove it by MinElute.
    Any inputs on how to avoid this are also very welcome.

    Thank you!
    osl
  • Isequencestuff
    Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 21

    #2
    What magnet are you using? It seems like your volume might be a little high for efficient bead binding, hence causing the cloudiness. Could you pool, then aliquot out into smaller volumes?

    Comment

    • kcchan
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 186

      #3
      How much ethanol are you using for your washes? If you have that much sample you may need up to 1mL of 80% ethanol in order to wash off all the PEG in the tube.

      Comment

      • osl
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 7

        #4
        For magnet, I was using the one from Millipore (Magna GrIP Rack -- 8 well), which wasn't a very effective magnet. I did try with the stronger Invitrogen one later. It seems a bit better but still had the same issue.

        That's true, I should have used more ethanol. I just used 200 ul of 80% EtOH in the washes. But as I've mentioned, in my 2nd attempt, which I only had 40 ul of sample, the eluates still looked a little bit cloudy.

        One thing I forgot to mention is the beads have past the expiray date, which is Jun 2012. I did test it right beforehand and it worked well (>90 recovery by Qubit). But that time, I did not vortex the beads before use. Compared to this, that run had much less beads and did not have the cloudy issue.

        Anyway, do you guys have good experience with the Ampure XP beads in general? Do you think new beads would be free of this problem?
        Also, what do you usually do or recommend when pooling multiple ChIP DNAs? For now, I'll go back to use MinElute.

        Thanks again!

        Comment

        • silin284
          Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 27

          #5
          contamination in DNA could cause that

          I have seen that if the DNA has a lot of secondary metabolite. i work with plants so it is pretty common. you can clean up the dna using a column before ampure xp. we perfer to do a phenol chloroform instead. best wishes...

          Comment

          • osl
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2012
            • 7

            #6
            Wow, may be that's why! The ChIP DNAs are from Arabidopsis. Also, the test sample that worked fine had gone through a Qiaquick column beforehand.
            Thank you for the input!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            24 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            34 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...