Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • osl
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 7

    #1

    Cloudy eluates with AMPure XP beads?

    Hi all,

    I was trying to pool my ChIP DNAs into one for library construction using the AMPure XP beads (300 ul sample + 1.6x beads).
    However, after adding 31 ul of TE for elution, I recovered around 37 ul AND it looks a bit cloudy.
    I did try repeating the XP purification once more (37 ul of eluates + 1.6x beads) but got similar results.
    I suspect the cloudiness is from the PEG-containing buffer of the beads, which somehow hasn't been efficiently removed.

    My main question is whether this "cloudiness" would interfere with later steps in library prep (next step would be Ends Repair) or it'd be better to remove it by MinElute.
    Any inputs on how to avoid this are also very welcome.

    Thank you!
    osl
  • Isequencestuff
    Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 21

    #2
    What magnet are you using? It seems like your volume might be a little high for efficient bead binding, hence causing the cloudiness. Could you pool, then aliquot out into smaller volumes?

    Comment

    • kcchan
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 186

      #3
      How much ethanol are you using for your washes? If you have that much sample you may need up to 1mL of 80% ethanol in order to wash off all the PEG in the tube.

      Comment

      • osl
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 7

        #4
        For magnet, I was using the one from Millipore (Magna GrIP Rack -- 8 well), which wasn't a very effective magnet. I did try with the stronger Invitrogen one later. It seems a bit better but still had the same issue.

        That's true, I should have used more ethanol. I just used 200 ul of 80% EtOH in the washes. But as I've mentioned, in my 2nd attempt, which I only had 40 ul of sample, the eluates still looked a little bit cloudy.

        One thing I forgot to mention is the beads have past the expiray date, which is Jun 2012. I did test it right beforehand and it worked well (>90 recovery by Qubit). But that time, I did not vortex the beads before use. Compared to this, that run had much less beads and did not have the cloudy issue.

        Anyway, do you guys have good experience with the Ampure XP beads in general? Do you think new beads would be free of this problem?
        Also, what do you usually do or recommend when pooling multiple ChIP DNAs? For now, I'll go back to use MinElute.

        Thanks again!

        Comment

        • silin284
          Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 27

          #5
          contamination in DNA could cause that

          I have seen that if the DNA has a lot of secondary metabolite. i work with plants so it is pretty common. you can clean up the dna using a column before ampure xp. we perfer to do a phenol chloroform instead. best wishes...

          Comment

          • osl
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2012
            • 7

            #6
            Wow, may be that's why! The ChIP DNAs are from Arabidopsis. Also, the test sample that worked fine had gone through a Qiaquick column beforehand.
            Thank you for the input!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...