Tweet
Capturing >60nt fragments
I am making a library for which it is essential to purify any RNA which is greater than 60-70nt and get rid of anything below that. Is there any column or bead based system that can purify all fragment above this cut-off without adding any size bias?
-
-
Could you make the library and then size select out anything too small rather than trying to size select the RNA? -
Actually, I am planning to do it after linker ligation. I can definitely select out anything smaller than that but I could not find any system to do that. Most systems purify RNA >200nt. I could use Millipore's cut-off filters but haven't heard if anybody used them before for this purpose
Comment
-
After linker ligation, what size are they? The TruSeq adapters add 120 so you would be looking at a reasonable size to select under.
Otherwise, why not go all the way to RT and such? Size select just before final PCR?Comment
-
why can't you use gel purification?Comment
-
Gel purification will be difficult in my case because I'm not looking for a particular size.
I've been researching about this and contacted several companies, here is what I found. Clontech has a set of gel filtration columns called "CHROMASPIN" columns. They come in different cut-off sizes, like CHROMASPIN 10, 100, 200, 400, 1000 etc. These columns are RNase free and available in TE or DEPC water. Apart from these, the Qiagen RNeasy (MinElute kit) columns can also be used for size selecting RNA. These columns bind to everything >200nt according to standard protocol, however, smaller RNA can also be bound by increasing the volume of ethanol. The Agencourt RNA clean XP beads are good for high yield, but the bind to relatively larger RNAs. I'm sure there are other methods available like the Amicon's filtration devices, however, I found the CHROMASPIN columns the most useful if they work well
Comment
-
I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.
Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...06-18-2026, 07:11 AM -
Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.
The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
...06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
Comment