Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jwfoley
    replied
    Does anyone know what ratio of Ampure XP beads:sample I must use to remove material from my library that is 150bp and below? My library is in 30ul of 1x TE.
    Look like about 0.8X from this: http://core-genomics.blogspot.ca/201...eads-work.html. But do your own test to make sure.

    Also note that what matters is the amount of buffer, not of beads. You can use a stingy amount of beads and bring up the rest with 20% PEG, 2.5M NaCl. KAPA includes this buffer with their library kit so you can put in beads once for the first enzymatic reaction and then keep reusing the same beads with the same samples.

    Also has anyone ever concentrated their final library in a DNA Speedvac/concentrator unit and sequenced it with reason being the library did not produce enough yield but the speedvac step allowed it to.
    I haven't but Microcon columns are very easy and can get it down to 10-20 µL.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zaag
    replied
    You could try google! 1.0-1.5 ratio should do it.

    Speedvac does not increase yield, just concentration. You can use it but make sure your library is in H2O.

    Leave a comment:


  • seqgirl123
    started a topic Ampure XP beads cleanup and concentration

    Ampure XP beads cleanup and concentration

    Does anyone know what ratio of Ampure XP beads:sample I must use to remove material from my library that is 150bp and below? My library is in 30ul of 1x TE.

    Also has anyone ever concentrated their final library in a DNA Speedvac/concentrator unit and sequenced it with reason being the library did not produce enough yield but the speedvac step allowed it to. I'm curious if the sequencing of this concentrated library worked out well?

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
    by SEQadmin2



    CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

    Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
    ...
    07-31-2026, 11:01 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
0 responses
49 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...