Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cbird
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 10

    #46
    We've found SPRI Select is much more effective than Ampure XP for size selection also. Anybody know what the difference is? I seriously doubt it's the beads themselves...

    Check out this paper. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%...l.pone.0010029

    They use varying percentages of PEG and 0.9M NaCl, not 2.5M. They are also using MyOne CA Dynabeads

    Comment

    • yaximik
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 199

      #47
      Originally posted by biozlzyc View Post
      The bead is overdried and there is no DNA in the supernate.What should I do?
      Use TE with 0.05% Tween20 and set it to shake at 37. You may also need to sonicate it a bit to break clumps, but I would not do it if DNA was large

      Comment

      • nextgen
        Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 26

        #48
        When you say more effective, you mean the range of the DNA size, distribution or recovery?

        Originally posted by cbird View Post
        We've found SPRI Select is much more effective than Ampure XP for size selection also. Anybody know what the difference is? I seriously doubt it's the beads themselves...

        Check out this paper. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%...l.pone.0010029

        They use varying percentages of PEG and 0.9M NaCl, not 2.5M. They are also using MyOne CA Dynabeads

        Comment

        • ctguhu
          Junior Member
          • Jul 2014
          • 1

          #49
          good questions, it give me some help, thanks everyone in this question

          Comment

          • aaron_tao
            Junior Member
            • Sep 2010
            • 6

            #50
            Anyone tried to purify double strand circular DNA by AmPure XP??

            Anyone tried to purify ~1kb double strand circular DNA by AmPure XP?

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              Yesterday, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            53 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...