Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • robertsr
    Member
    • Oct 2019
    • 10

    Potential issues with larger insert sizes (450bp) for 2x150bp Illumina sequencing

    Hello,

    We have prepared some metagenomic sequencing libraries using the NEBNext® Ultra™ II FS DNA PCR-free Library Prep Kit for Illumina kit in which we chose an insert size of 450bp. We will be sequencing with NovaSeq X Plus 2x150bp paired-end. We are worried that our long insert sizes will leave too large of an inner distance between the two reads ultimately resulting in poor sequencing quality. I am aware of literature reporting both benefits (https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.co...64-022-08316-y) and limitations (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-39076-7) or longer insert/fragment sizes.

    Does anyone have any experience/advice on whether these libraries with longer insert sizes (450bp plus adapters/indexes) will pose an issue for 2x150bp sequencing?

    Thanks!
  • MU Core
    Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 60

    #2
    Our group routinely prepare libraries with insert sizes of 550 bp. Your sequencing quality will not be impacted, but , as you've noted, the gap between the reads will be larger which shouldn't be an issue. However, you may have to optimize the loading concentration for these libraries due to the larger size of the fragments.

    Comment

    • fchatonnet
      Member
      • Sep 2014
      • 30

      #3
      Dear robertsr,

      I don't think that 450 bp of insert size will be an issue, as long as you're not interested in the whole insert sequence. For ATAC-seq, we routinely prepare libraries with insert sizes ranging from 100 bp to 2 kb and as long as you're careful with libraries quantification, equimolar mix and loading concentration, everything should be fine.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...