Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • paolo.kunder
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 93

    Adaptor dimer contamination

    Dear All,

    We are facing some problems with adaptor dimers in Illumina RNA seq library prep.

    There is a small amount of adaptor dimer (at ~150 bp) in a few of the samples. We tried a second bead clean up on half of the sample, but lost a significant amount of material. We talked with Illumina tech support, and this is a tiny enough amount of adaptor that they felt if was fine to go forward. There will be some adaptor only reads that the analyst can filter from the data, but it should be a small percentage.

    I attach the profile of the sample most contaminated, do you think this wont influence the amplicfication of my library??

    Many thanks,
    Paolo
    Attached Files
  • Genohub
    Registered Vendor
    • Mar 2013
    • 210

    #2
    Ampure Size Selection to remove adapter dimer

    Hi Paolo,

    What bead to sample volume ratio did you use for your cleanup? If you use the wrong ratio, loss of library is possible. See slide 52: http://www.broadinstitute.org/files/...PrepSlides.pdf

    A ratio of 0.7-0.8x is pretty effective at removing the adapter dimer band without resulting in sample loss.

    I would personally do one more cleanup to completely remove the dimer band. Try it out on a non-precious sample first to test.

    - Genohub

    Comment

    • microgirl123
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 199

      #3
      That's a lot of adapter dimer relative to your sample! Adapter dimer tends to hybridize to the flow cell much better than your actual library. I'd be worried about sequencing mainly adapter dimer if I loaded that onto our MiSeq.

      Comment

      • KJoseph
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2013
        • 3

        #4
        In my experience, that amount of adapter dimer would cause some significant problems on a MiSeq, and you would definitely lose quite a number of reads on HiSeq as well.

        Comment

        • hewei
          Junior Member
          • Sep 2013
          • 4

          #5
          dilute your adaptors, up to 10 folds dilution, you can try different ratio to get the best result.

          Comment

          • liuqy
            Junior Member
            • Sep 2018
            • 3

            #6
            Yes, this will definitely fail quality control. Nowadays the beads have improved a lot. You can use AmPure XP or NVIGEN MagVigen. But MagVigen fares better. https://www.nvigen.com/dna-clean-up/

            Disclosure: I work at NVIGEN. In case you find problems using MagVigen. We will be happily work with you to troubleshoot or fine tune it for your needs.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              Today, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            9 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            52 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            110 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...