Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ddRadTag Fragment Size Selection for EcoRI

    Hi everyone,
    I'm currently trying to optimise a ddradtag protocol and after we received our first set of sequences back, it appears we've had a few issues. (We are using Stacks to analyse our data)
    My first question is, when using EcoRI as one of the digest enzymes, does anyone know if there should be a difference in fragment numbers depending on which size you select? We are going mostly off the Peterson paper and according to them, the fragment distribution appears to be fairly uniform.
    We have size selected for ~400bp (+/- 50bp) which I know is quite a large window, but we are getting fairly excessive numbers of stacks (upwards of 75000) with quite a low depth.
    I'm thinking its fairly likely that this is due to our wide size selection range, but as other people seem to be selecting smaller fragments, I was wondering if this is likely to have any effect?
    Any advice would be appreciated.
    Cheers

  • #2
    What species are you genotyping and what is your second enzyme? If the GC content differs from the GC of the second enzyme, then that will shift the size distribution of the fragments. Are you size selecting on a Pippin?
    Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com

    Comment


    • #3
      We are doing Koala and Black lip oyster (and a few other species which we haven't looked at properly yet). Our second enzyme is MspI and we chose to use the pippin prep for size selection as we figured it would be more accurate than a gel cut.
      I'm just trying to work out why we ended up with so many fragments compared to what others have documented.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hmmm, MspI is GC rich, and pearl oyster (is that a comparable reference?) is AT-rich, so that would significantly increase the size of ddRAD fragments, and EcoRI is AT-rich, so that would increase the number of loci. But if you are seeing the same pattern in different species with different GC contents, that wouldn't really explain it.

        If there are lots of polymorphisms then reads that should be allelic might be kept as separate loci as well, so that could contribute.
        Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Best Practices for Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis
          by seqadmin



          While isolating and preparing single cells for sequencing was historically the bottleneck, recent technological advancements have shifted the challenge to data analysis. This highlights the rapidly evolving nature of single-cell sequencing. The inherent complexity of single-cell analysis has intensified with the surge in data volume and the incorporation of diverse and more complex datasets. This article explores the challenges in analysis, examines common pitfalls, offers...
          06-06-2024, 07:15 AM
        • seqadmin
          Latest Developments in Precision Medicine
          by seqadmin



          Technological advances have led to drastic improvements in the field of precision medicine, enabling more personalized approaches to treatment. This article explores four leading groups that are overcoming many of the challenges of genomic profiling and precision medicine through their innovative platforms and technologies.

          Somatic Genomics
          “We have such a tremendous amount of genetic diversity that exists within each of us, and not just between us as individuals,”...
          05-24-2024, 01:16 PM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, Today, 02:20 PM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 06-07-2024, 06:58 AM
        0 responses
        180 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 06-06-2024, 08:18 AM
        0 responses
        228 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 06-06-2024, 08:04 AM
        0 responses
        184 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X