Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kshazand
    Junior Member
    • May 2008
    • 8

    DNA fragmentation methods

    Hi all,
    Different physical damages are made to DNA during sonication. Yet, we all use Covaris and other similar sonicators for library prep.
    I would like to know how many of my colleagues have observed or even looked at the DNA state and what you think of potential alternatives to shearing.
    Kamran
    Kamran SHAZAND, PhD
  • rnaeye
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 80

    #2
    NEB has an enzyme called Fragmentase for this purpose. Maybe one of many alternatives.
    This product generates dsDNA breaks randomly in a time-dependent manner to yield 50-1,000 bp DNA fragments depending on reaction time.

    Comment

    • kshazand
      Junior Member
      • May 2008
      • 8

      #3
      Yes thank you, I know Fragmentase, but since it is mainly based on restriction enzymes, the output has some bias. What other "many alternatives" are you refering to?
      Kamran SHAZAND, PhD

      Comment

      • luc
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 469

        #4
        The transposase protocols (nextera et al.) are the other alternative, of course also with some biases.
        In general I guess/assume sonication will not introduce any significant biases ( I do not know if anybody has looked at it); at least not to a degree that they will not be trumped by biases of the required downstream enzymatic processes. If you can create your libraries PCR-free after sonication you should have very few worries.

        Originally posted by kshazand View Post
        Yes thank you, I know Fragmentase, but since it is mainly based on restriction enzymes, the output has some bias. What other "many alternatives" are you refering to?

        Comment

        • rnaeye
          Member
          • May 2011
          • 80

          #5
          kshazand,
          Fragmentase is enzyme based but does not use restriction enzyme.

          Comment

          • kshazand
            Junior Member
            • May 2008
            • 8

            #6
            Originally posted by luc View Post
            The transposase protocols (nextera et al.) are the other alternative, of course also with some biases.
            In general I guess/assume sonication will not introduce any significant biases ( I do not know if anybody has looked at it); at least not to a degree that they will not be trumped by biases of the required downstream enzymatic processes. If you can create your libraries PCR-free after sonication you should have very few worries.
            luc,
            Ppl looked into sonicated DNA and it does have all sorts of damages, hence my question.
            Kamran SHAZAND, PhD

            Comment

            • kshazand
              Junior Member
              • May 2008
              • 8

              #7
              Originally posted by rnaeye View Post
              kshazand,
              Fragmentase is enzyme based but does not use restriction enzyme.
              What enzymes are they then?
              Kamran SHAZAND, PhD

              Comment

              • rnaeye
                Member
                • May 2011
                • 80

                #8
                I believe you need to ask that to NEB.

                Comment

                • rnaeye
                  Member
                  • May 2011
                  • 80

                  #9

                  Comment

                  • Genohub
                    Registered Vendor
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 210

                    #10
                    6 Methods to Fragment DNA or RNA for NGS

                    These are the 6 main methods used to fragment DNA or RNA for NGS: http://blog.genohub.com/fragmentatio...-library-prep/

                    I'd be interested to see if there have been any detailed studies comparing the bias introduced by each of these.

                    - Genohub

                    Comment

                    • luc
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 469

                      #11
                      Originally posted by kshazand View Post
                      luc,
                      Ppl looked into sonicated DNA and it does have all sorts of damages, hence my question.
                      Hi kshazand,

                      I would be interested in data related to this. Could you point me to them?

                      The Knierim et al paper touches mostly on outdated methods:

                      Comment

                      • Genohub
                        Registered Vendor
                        • Mar 2013
                        • 210

                        #12
                        Interesting paper examines transcriptome reassembly and determines it is sensitive to RNA fragmentation technique. Concludes that Zn mediated fragmentation provides a better transcript ID compared to cleavage by RNase III: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...46202313000789

                        I wonder if this has been tested with Mg.

                        - Genohub

                        Comment

                        • Genohub
                          Registered Vendor
                          • Mar 2013
                          • 210

                          #13
                          Another interesting paper on Non-random DNA fragmentation in next-generation sequencing: http://www.nature.com/srep/2014/1403...srep04532.html

                          - Genohub

                          Comment

                          • luc
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 469

                            #14
                            Thanks a lot for the links Genohub!

                            I have the impression, the authors of this specific paper have completely forgotten about any base-specific biases of enzymes involved in end-repair, A-tailing, and ligation.

                            E.g. ligation bias:



                            Originally posted by Genohub View Post
                            Another interesting paper on Non-random DNA fragmentation in next-generation sequencing: http://www.nature.com/srep/2014/1403...srep04532.html

                            - Genohub

                            Comment

                            • Genohub
                              Registered Vendor
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 210

                              #15
                              I'm aware of the RNA ligase biases in small RNA / RNA-Seq. Have you seen any papers about T4 DNA Ligase bias in DNA-Seq applications. I don't think this has been looked at as carefully. If anyone has used 'in-line' adapter barcodes during ligation, they may be in a unique position to comment.

                              - Genohub

                              Comment

                              Latest Articles

                              Collapse

                              • SEQadmin2
                                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                                by SEQadmin2


                                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


                                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                              • SEQadmin2
                                From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                                by SEQadmin2


                                Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                                The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                                ...
                                06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                              ad_right_rmr

                              Collapse

                              News

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                              0 responses
                              26 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                              0 responses
                              43 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                              0 responses
                              48 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                              0 responses
                              49 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Working...