Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Elsie
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 85

    ChiP-seq - ThermoScientific Pierce Kit - possibly overfixed DNA

    Hi, newbie to ChiP-seq. I have two libraries prepared with the Thermo Scientific Pierce Magnetic ChIP kit, micrococcal nuclease digestion and sonication. QC from an Agilent Tapestation shows several low peaks at ~180bp, 363, 537 and 713bp respectively. Normal practice I'm told is to pick at 180bp and generate libraries from that. With such a tiny peak there, I could either:
    - stick with 180bp, but not have much material to generate my library from
    - pick from several peaks but then end up with fragments of different sizes, which could make the bioinformatics hard.

    So would I:
    - do the size selection and end up with a small amount of material
    - skip the size selection (or rather have a broad size selection) and deal with the consequences later

    Any advice appreciated, this experiment is unlikely to be repeated so I'll need to work with what I've got.
    thanks.
    Last edited by Elsie; 05-18-2014, 07:49 PM. Reason: Clarify question.
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    If you prepare libraries with DNA samples described there, there will be two downstream issues. Firstly, accurate quantification of libraries for clustering with multiple peaks is difficult and inaccurate quantification can result in over or under clustering which will affect read number or quality or both, although that might be considered sequencing service provider problem. Secondly, small fragments are more efficient in cluster formation in comparison with large fragments and more of your reads will be from sequencing smaller fragments.

    Comment

    • Elsie
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 85

      #3
      Thanks Nucacidhunter, your comments are exactly what I suspected would happen downstream. Unfortunately these libraries are not going to be remade so I will just have to work with what I've got. Thank you.

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        One suggestion I have reluctantly because I have not tried it myself, is shearing pool of your DNA with a Covaris set to 150-200 bp if you have access to one. In this case smaller fragment would not shear any further but larger fragments should shear. You can try shearing a cheap source of DNA to your current peaks. Pooling them to emulate your current ChIP DNA pool and trying shearing on them first to ensure that it works and that also will allow you to optimize if things does not work out at first go.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          Yesterday, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        8 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...