Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BUFtoBOS
    Junior Member
    • May 2014
    • 2

    Truseq cDNA libraries show sharp peak of cDNA

    Hi everyone! I just completed cDNA library prep using Illumina's Truseq RNA sample prep v2. Out of 8 libraries, 6 show the appropriate size distribution of my cDNA fragments (around 200-500bp). However, the first and sixth sample show a much sharper peak of cDNA fragments, right about 200-250bps. (An agarose gel is attached- the last lane is an older cDNA library I ran as a control). qPCR using adapter specific primers shows that these fragments do have ligated adapters. What could have caused this sharper peak? And are these samples comparable if I submit for sequencing, or should I repeat the library prep?

    Thanks!
    Attached Files
  • gman85cini
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2014
    • 2

    #2
    Did you ever find a solution to this problem. I'm having a similar issue right now.

    Thanks!

    Giacomo

    Comment

    • BUFtoBOS
      Junior Member
      • May 2014
      • 2

      #3
      Hi Giacomo,

      I had a few people suggest that the difference in bands might be due to lower concentrations of cDNA in those samples, however, my yields were all very comparable. I ended up remaking the libraries from the same RNA and no longer saw this issue, so unfortunately I never quite figured out what the issue was or if the samples would work for sequencing. Sorry I can't help more- good luck!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      17 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...