Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ayaka
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 6

    Genomic DNA integrity importance in amplicon sequencing

    Hi there, in my lab we are going to be sequencing 16S with Miseq from stool samples and we are currently in the DNA extraction step.

    We are using Qiagen's QiAmp DNA stool mini kit and have performed an additional step of bead beating that gives us twice of the final DNA concentration. The issue is that when we check the integrity we see smear bands.

    How important is if we want to see diversity to start with integral DNA?

    We think is important, since we don´t have a way to control what DNA is being degraded and we might loose 16S of some bacterias, but we have performed RFLP-PCR and the profiles are very similar and wanted to ask for your experience.

    Thanks!
  • Baseless
    Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 31

    #2
    When sampling DNA from stool I'd expect a stromg degree of degradation and thus a high spread of sizes on gel/bioanalyzer. Even if you have DNA from blood and purify, you would rather see a smear in a certain range typical for your purification method than a sharp peak we know from (most) PCR products. What I would question is, if you do your PCR for whatever 16s fragment you intend to sequence - do you get a PCR product of an appropriate size range?

    Comment

    • Ayaka
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2014
      • 6

      #3
      Hi Baseless thank you for answering. We indeed get a PCR product of the appropriate size. A person from a sequencing center told me that as long as the smeared bands are above the size of the PCR product you want to amplify it would be Ok.
      I still think it could cause loss of diversity though, because of the random fragmentation of the DNA, although I guess it might not be such a big deal...

      Comment

      • Baseless
        Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 31

        #4
        And one more thing to consider on the final product: the 16s amplicons are a diverse thing, so they are allowed to differ a bit in size.
        I would not tolerate this from a PCR amplicon for resequencing of a defined region like for deep-coverage SNV validation, but a degree of size range is ok with me on 16s, TCR and BCR variable regions.
        However, never let your guard down on small fragments on adapter dimers, they only lead into trouble.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          Yesterday, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        10 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        31 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...