Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SeqVicious
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 20

    Good RIN, bad mRNA?

    Hello, I'm preparing some RNA for RNAseq and I submitted my samples to the local sequencing core for quality control on the bioanalyzer. The results came back and my samples have good RIN values, almost all >9. But I can't see a nice bump for the mRNA in which I am interested. I'm not sure if all of the peaks along the electrophoretogram are obscuring the mRNA. Should I trust these samples based on the RIN value alone? I want to proceed to ribosome depletion but I don't want to waste an expensive kit on samples that might not have good mRNA in them.

    The attached is an example of my bioanalyzer results.

    Thanks!
    Attached Files
  • MU Core
    Member
    • Apr 2008
    • 60

    #2
    You won't visualize the mRNA using the standard RNA quality check. The mRNA is a small percentage of the total RNA from the extraction. What is being visualized is the ribosomal RNA which when intact, as in your sample, you infer a similar level of quality to the mRNA in the sample.

    Comment

    • Asaf
      Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 20

      #3
      If you're still skeptic you can always take some of the RNA and PCR your mRNA of interest to make sure it's there. However, you shouldn't worry as MU Core said, there are no peaks for mRNAs in bioAnalyzer.

      Comment

      • kerplunk412
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2012
        • 119

        #4
        mRNA is only 1-3% of total RNA, so as others have said you can't really see it at all in total RNA. Having intact rRNA peaks is basically an indication that you are not seeing significant degradation in your sample, so you can safely assume that your mRNAs are also intact.

        I will also save you some confusion later: after rRNA depletion you have a large peak of tRNA, so you STILL can't see the mRNA. Also, since so much of the rRNA depleted sample is tRNA, you will need to use more rRNA depleted sample vs poly(A) enriched sample for library prep. For example, if your protocol calls for 1 ng of poly(A) RNA, you should probably use at lease 10 ng of rRNA depleted RNA.

        Also, since you are performing rRNA depletion it doesn't matter much if your RNA is somewhat degraded, as long as it isn't very badly degraded. So I think you can confidently proceed with the RNA you have. Good luck!

        Comment

        • SeqVicious
          Member
          • Sep 2011
          • 20

          #5
          Thank you for the responses. I will trust my RNA based on the rRNA peaks and continue on!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...