Tweet
Has anyone used TruSeq RNA or NEBNext RNA kits and tried to scale the volumes down or up? Is this even possible? Just curious to see if I can add more to generate more libraries, or less to proportionally add less RNA input.
-
-
Scaling up a reaction volume will not result in more library, unless you scale up the input accordingly. Pretty much all NGS kits should already get you much more library than you need for sequencing if you use the highest recommended input, so there wouldn't be much point in scaling up a reaction, in my opinion.
Scaling down a reaction could be performed, but it probably will not allow you to go below the recommended input. The biggest advantage of scaling down is saving money. Scaling down may require some slight optimization, but if you have a lot of samples to prep it may be worth the optimization if you can make a kit last twice as long.
-
Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.
The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
...06-02-2026, 10:05 AM -
With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.
Introduction
Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...05-22-2026, 06:42 AM
Comment