Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TAR76
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2015
    • 2

    260/230 and RNA-seq library prep

    Hi,
    Does anyone have experience of low 260/230 values for RNA impacting adversely on Illumina truseq total RNA library prep for RNA-seq? I have good 260/280 values and adequate quantities of RNA but low 260/230s. I have heard various opinions about the utility of 260/230 ratios but wondered what other experiences were? Thanks!
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    Originally posted by TAR76 View Post
    Hi,
    Does anyone have experience of low 260/230 values for RNA impacting adversely on Illumina truseq total RNA library prep for RNA-seq? I have good 260/280 values and adequate quantities of RNA but low 260/230s. I have heard various opinions about the utility of 260/230 ratios but wondered what other experiences were? Thanks!
    My opinion is that since you are probably using a Nanodrop that does all the work of producing an entire spectrum for you, why not just look at that rather than use a ratio metric designed back when you had to manually change wavelengths on most spectrophotometers?

    If you did, you might have a chance of identifying the contaminating substance by its UV absorbance spectrum.

    If you are willing to consider the spectrum, check out my thread on this subject:

    Techniques and protocol discussions on sample preparation, library generation, methods and ideas


    The short answer is that the most common culprits for causing your A230 to skew higher are:

    (1) Acetic acid and salts thereof.
    (2) Guanidine -- HCl and Isothiocyanate salts have different spectra
    (3) Betamercaptoethanol.

    Note that I don't include phenol! Phenol has a higher absorbance at A260 than at A230, so it can't be responsible for decreasing your 260/230 ratio. Oh, unless you are using Tris-acetate buffer to equilibrate your phenol. But then it is the acetate, not the phenol decreasing your 260/230 ratio.

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • LTJensen
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 5

      #3
      Yes, we have seen that low 260/230 ratios negatively affects the TruSeq total RNA prep. When we experience low ratios, we always do a wash on a MinElute filter to improve purity.

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        Originally posted by LTJensen View Post
        Yes, we have seen that low 260/230 ratios negatively affects the TruSeq total RNA prep. When we experience low ratios, we always do a wash on a MinElute filter to improve purity.
        Ah, a ritual of purification. I was in a lab once that had a shrine to the "oligod". Lab members would burn pieces of nitrocellulose there before an important molecular experiment.

        Here is something to think about -- what about all the "contaminants" that don't absorb UV? How are you detecting those?

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        • LTJensen
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2014
          • 5

          #5
          I see your point pmiguel, nevertheless the ritual worked for us... When ratios are fine, we never have problems with that particular protocol.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          28 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...