Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Angelmass
    Member
    • Jun 2015
    • 10

    #1

    ctDNA isolation from plasma

    Hey guys,

    We're currently looking for alternative ctDNA extraction kits. We currently use QIAGENs QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit for our plasma extractions (10ml plasma). It does currently seem like the more plasma we use as a source, the less ng ctDNA/ml plasma we're getting, and we're concerned with the filters getting clogged. Right now we're around 60ng / ml plasma when plasma volume <= 5ml, and about 10ng / ml plasma when more than 5ml plasma was used.

    Anyway I was wondering what kind of alternatives are out there that are viable methods, and what kind of yields you are seeing in the lab.

    DNA size is about 100-300bp via Tapestation. Yields analyzed with Qubit.
  • Bioo Scientific
    Registered Vendor
    • Oct 2009
    • 99

    #2
    Bioo Scientific's NextPrep-Mag™ cfDNA Isolation Kit should be able to help you. It is designed for extracting cfDNA from human blood plasma for NGS library prep using a scalable magnetic bead-based format. Typical input plasma volumes range from 0.6 mL – 4 mL, although amounts of plasma outside this range are also compatible with the kit.

    Comment

    • Angelmass
      Member
      • Jun 2015
      • 10

      #3
      How much outside this range? We are trying to isolate 10ml plasma at a time.

      Comment

      • Bioo Scientific
        Registered Vendor
        • Oct 2009
        • 99

        #4
        Isolating 5 mL at a time is achievable. For 10 mL you'll need to perform two cfDNA isolations from plasma.

        Comment

        • han526
          Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 11

          #5
          plasma ctDNA

          Have you found any suitable kit for your application? Aline Biosciences now has a magnetic beads based kit for plasma cell free DNA extraction. it can deal with large volume of plasma. 10 mL is not a problem.

          Also, how accurate is the Qubit quantification of ctDNA based on your experience?


          Originally posted by Angelmass View Post
          Hey guys,

          We're currently looking for alternative ctDNA extraction kits. We currently use QIAGENs QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit for our plasma extractions (10ml plasma). It does currently seem like the more plasma we use as a source, the less ng ctDNA/ml plasma we're getting, and we're concerned with the filters getting clogged. Right now we're around 60ng / ml plasma when plasma volume <= 5ml, and about 10ng / ml plasma when more than 5ml plasma was used.

          Anyway I was wondering what kind of alternatives are out there that are viable methods, and what kind of yields you are seeing in the lab.

          DNA size is about 100-300bp via Tapestation. Yields analyzed with Qubit.

          Comment

          • Angelmass
            Member
            • Jun 2015
            • 10

            #6
            Originally posted by han526 View Post
            Have you found any suitable kit for your application? Aline Biosciences now has a magnetic beads based kit for plasma cell free DNA extraction. it can deal with large volume of plasma. 10 mL is not a problem.

            Also, how accurate is the Qubit quantification of ctDNA based on your experience?
            At the moment, we're sticking with QIAGEN kits simply because the contract that we have stipulates that we use the contractor's protocol for guaranteed results during clinical workflow.

            As for the accuracy, that's difficult to say, as our QC cutoff is pretty low (12ng; 0.20ng/ul), and anything above that is concentration independent. So we use it more for a qualitative check rather than quantitative. As far as we can tell though we haven't had any issues due to concentration errors.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
              by SEQadmin2



              CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

              Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
              ...
              07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
            0 responses
            40 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            26 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...