Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jerrybug109
    Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 10

    How to quantiate extracted DNA before sending it for sequencing?

    Hi all,

    We just extracted DNA on several samples using Epicenter Masterpure Gram Positive DNA extraction kit. We're going to send it to an NGS service to be library prepped and DNA sequenced, and the NGS service is requesting us perform some quality check on our DNA samples before shipping it to them.

    Their criteria are:

    DNA sample amount: at least 1.6 micrograms
    DNA concentration: at least 20 nanograms/microliter
    O.D. 260/280: between 1.8-2.0

    It seems that Qubit or Nanodrop allows you to determine DNA concentration and O.D. Are there tools that give you determine the sample amount (in micrograms), or do you just calculate the sample amount from your concentration using simple math?

    I'm new to this process - thanks!

    - jerrybug109
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Qubit is the best for quantitation for this purpose and total amount is just the simple math. NanoDrop is good for checking potential contaminants left from extraction process and it is normally accurate if concentration is above 15 ng/ul.

    Comment

    • jerrybug109
      Member
      • Oct 2015
      • 10

      #3
      Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
      Qubit is the best for quantitation for this purpose and total amount is just the simple math. NanoDrop is good for checking potential contaminants left from extraction process and it is normally accurate if concentration is above 15 ng/ul.
      Thanks, we have Qubit and both Nanodrop. I'll check it out!

      Comment

      • fpj
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 4

        #4
        Qubit is best for checking DNA quality. It binds to double stranded DNA and so gives a better indication of yield compared to nanodrop. Nanodrop will always say the yield is higher than Qubit. A lot of sequencing places use qubit as part of their QC process and so it's best to use that than nanodrop.

        Comment

        • kerplunk412
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2012
          • 119

          #5
          Originally posted by fpj View Post
          Qubit is best for checking DNA quality. It binds to double stranded DNA and so gives a better indication of yield compared to nanodrop. Nanodrop will always say the yield is higher than Qubit. A lot of sequencing places use qubit as part of their QC process and so it's best to use that than nanodrop.
          I believe you mean DNA quantity. Sorry to be nit-picky but the difference is important here. Nanodrop is actually better for quality because impurities can be seen.

          Comment

          • fpj
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2015
            • 4

            #6
            Originally posted by kerplunk412 View Post
            I believe you mean DNA quantity. Sorry to be nit-picky but the difference is important here. Nanodrop is actually better for quality because impurities can be seen.
            Oh yes. My mistake!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              Yesterday, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            10 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            7 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            31 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...