TruSeq nano library changes?

anna_m

Member

Join Date: Jun 2013

Posts: 17
- Share
- Tweet
#1

TruSeq nano library changes?

12-21-2015, 04:04 AM

Hello, have anyone noticed their TruSeq nano libraries having a higher yield and/or giving larger size distributions recently?

The new version of the protocol (June 2015) has a change in the library QC section where it asks for a 1 in 100 dilution to check quality on a HS bioanalyser chip and also to use 470bp or 670bp for the size instead of the actual size which is like the PCR-free method? Have the kit components been optimised?

Thanks and all the best,
Anna.
Tags: library preparation, truseq dna, truseq nano

Previous template Next

Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems

by SEQadmin2

Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...
- Channel: Articles
Today, 11:10 AM
Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival

by SEQadmin2

Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
- Channel: Articles
Yesterday, 05:17 AM
Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing

by GATTACAT

Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
- Channel: Articles
07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

Topics	Statistics	Last Post
New Analysis Splits Leukemia Into 16 Epigenomic Subgroups by SEQadmin2 Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM	0 responses 7 views 0 reactions	Last Post by SEQadmin2 Today, 10:04 AM
Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen Uncovers Unlikely Psoriasis Target by SEQadmin2 Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM	0 responses 6 views 0 reactions	Last Post by SEQadmin2 Yesterday, 10:08 AM
Engineered Protein Motor Takes Its First Steps Along DNA Track by SEQadmin2 Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM	0 responses 9 views 0 reactions	Last Post by SEQadmin2 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
High-Resolution Sequencing Exposes Hidden Toxoplasma Diversity by SEQadmin2 Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM	0 responses 31 views 0 reactions	Last Post by SEQadmin2 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM

Unconfigured Ad

TruSeq nano library changes?

Latest Articles

ad_right_rmr

News