Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • superpyrin
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2014
    • 7

    MiSeq errors on scFv linker

    Hi, we used MiSeq 250 to sequence amplicon library of scFv antibody variants. Heavy and light chains are connected by a peptide linker (HeavyChain-GGGGSGGGGSGGGGS-LightChain). We saw dramatic increase in quality of forward reads in the region of the linker from which it never recovered (see figure). We think it is due to high G content and repetitive occurrence of GGC/GGT motifs that are known to cause sequencing errors.

    What can be done to maintain a good quality throughout the read?
    Can this be resolved by suitable sample preparation?
    Can you recommend alternative scFv linkers that are known to work well with MiSeq?
    Attached Files
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    Was there a spike-in added (phiX or some other high diversity DNA)? If not that would be one thing to start looking at.

    Comment

    • superpyrin
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2014
      • 7

      #3
      yes, there was around 60% of PhiX

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Have you talked with Illumina tech support to see if they have any recommendations? What was the cluster density for this run? Since you had plenty of phiX you are not going to see any additional improvement by that strategy.

        You need to start thinking about changing your experimental strategy by inclusion of some spacers (padding) in your primers etc. Someone with experimental expertise will need to add the specifics for how you could do that.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        17 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...