Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sehrrot
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 58

    #1

    QuBit fluorimeter vs. Epoch?

    Dear all,

    I measured DNA concentration with two way, QuBit and Epoch.
    For NimbleGen exome capture in Illumina sequencing, DNA is needed 30ng/ul.

    But DNA concentration measured by Epoch (900ng/ul) was way higher than DNA measured by Qubit(700 ng/ul). I used DNA BR kit for QuBit.

    Is Qubit more reliable? I assumed that epoch cannot detect low concentration well.
    Last edited by sehrrot; 09-13-2010, 05:28 PM.
  • v_kisand
    Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 38

    #2
    I am afraid none of them is reliable. When possible use the most conservative value.

    Comment

    • niceday
      Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 68

      #3
      we use Qubit. We find it gives values slightly higher than the bioanalyser but we base our conc's and experiments on the Qubit readings and haven't had any problems. We also use Qubit and bioanalyser after fragmentation...basically whenever the protocols say bioanalyser we also do Qubit.

      Comment

      • Zaag
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 112

        #4
        For 30 ng/ul I would use the HS kit on the Qubit.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Yesterday, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        21 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        71 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...