Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jgibbons1
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 135

    GEX Second Strand Buffer

    This is the second strand buffer provided by the Illumina kit.

    Does anyone have a recipe for it?

    Many thanks,

    John
  • plantseq
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 2

    #2
    Neb

    Hey John,
    the Illumina second strand synthesis is not so different from the NEB one. There the buffer is composed of 10mM Tris-HCL (pH 7.5), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA and 50% glycerol.
    However, I would guess that Illumina also puts some E. coli DNA Ligase already in the buffer. If you want to use that buffer I would add 6.000 units/ml DNA Polymerase I, 5.000 units/ml RNase H and 25.000 units/ml E.coli DNA ligase to the mix.
    Good luck,
    Ben

    Comment

    • jgibbons1
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 135

      #3
      Awesome! Thanks Ben...

      I've been using a similar recipe with pretty good:

      500mM Tris-HCL (pH 7.8)
      50mM MgCl2
      10mM DTT

      I'd like to try yours out though. I'll let you know if there are any major differences.

      Thanks,

      John

      Comment

      • plantseq
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 2

        #4
        Hey John,
        the buffer described previously is only the solution the enzymes are kept in. Here is the reaction buffer you put them in together with your single strand cDNA. Sorry about that,
        Ben

        1X NEBNext Second Strand Synthesis Reaction Buffer:
        20 mM Tris-HCl
        12 mM (NH4)2SO4
        5 mM MgCl2
        0.16 mM β-NAD
        0.19 mM dNTPs each
        pH 7.4 @ 25°C

        Comment

        • BSP13
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2013
          • 1

          #5
          Hey all,

          sorry for digging this thread but I have a related question:
          I want to perform a second strand synthesis of my cDNA. Originally, I planned to use the Invitrogen Superscript System but it is too expensive for my project budget. So I ordered reagents separately and wanted to use the NEB Buffer. The only difference I could spot is that NEB doesnt use KCl (final concentration in Superscript System is 90mM). NEB states that their System is suitable for 10-100ng of template. Invitrogen states that templates up to several ug are possible. So my questions are: what is the role of KCl in the Buffer and is there any connection between it's application and the template restriction?

          Thank you for any help here!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          24 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...