Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HelenaSC
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 21

    Problems with NEXTERA DNA FLEX ENRICHMENT

    Hi there!
    Anyone working with Illumina Nextera DNA Flex for Enrichment?

    We are experiencing some problems related to the hybridization or capture step. We don't know why, but after pooling the samples (12 samples in one pool, total 8 pools) and doing the capture, there is always some pools that don't perform correctly and gave very low yield and concentration.

    We have performed 6 96-plates and in each of the processing of these plates, there is always this issue, and it seems to be at random.

    We pool by mass, and we always quantify the samples with Qubit before pooling them, so, it has no relation with the hibridized amount. I mean, we hybridize the same total nanograms on each pool, but some of them work properly and others just don't...all the samples are fresh gDNA.

    Any idea??

    Thanks a lot in advance!!!
  • luc
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 469

    #2
    What QC information do you have for the libraries before pooling and capture?
    After sequencing, how is the read number within the pools?

    Comment

    • HelenaSC
      Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 21

      #3
      Dear Luc,

      THanks for your comments. Before polling the libraries, they are quantified by Qubit and analyzed with TapeStation , so we can be sure that the amount and the profile is ok before pooling them. We pool the same amount of library on each pool...That's why we don't understand why some pools are not giving good results after capture process.

      Those pools that give low yield are not sequenced (for now), but the others, that are processed exactly the same way, are good while sequencing....

      Thanks!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      38 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      100 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      121 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      114 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...