Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rabiecqa
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 8

    RNA quality (bioanalyser) for agilent microarray

    hi,
    i have this profile of RNA quality to preceed for microarray , one strange peak is apearing every time.
    can you help me?
    the picture is there.
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    There are several possibilities. It probably is not a result of RNA degradation because you have clean large and small sub-unit rRNA peaks that appear in roughly the expected stoichiometry.

    Possibly the sample has been ribo-depleted prior to the Bioanalyzer run? A single cycle of most ribo-depletion methodologies will leave some rRNA behind. The result could look like the image you show above. Then the answer would be "that is your non-ribosomal RNA".

    Alternatively there may be some other RNA that is being transcribed to extremely high levels in your samples. These could include some highly induced gene, viral RNA, contamination from previous RNA preps done in the same centrifuge tube.

    Finally, you do not say what species this RNA is from. The large sub unit rRNA looks a little smaller than I would expect for a mammal. If this RNA is of mammalian origin, the sample may have been eukaryotic-rRNA depleted (eg, Invitrogen ribo-minus) but still retain some mitochondrial rRNA peaks. Or, alternatively, there may be some bacterial component to the total RNA. Again, a ribo-depletion method that was eukaryotic rRNA-specific would remove the eukaryotic rRNA, but perhaps not the bacterial rRNA.

    If you gave us a little more information about the sample (is it total RNA or has it been ribo-depleted? what species and tissue is it from? Etc.) the possibilities would be narrowed.

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • rabiecqa
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 8

      #3
      hi,
      The samples were freezed in 10% DMSO and Fetal bovine serum .Then the total RNA was extracted from human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear cells(PBMC) by using "RNaseasy Qiagen mini Kit.The problem is majority of the samples have this additional peak.Please give me some suggesions.

      Comment

      • rabiecqa
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 8

        #4
        some of additional results there:
        1:NK cells
        2: PBMCs cells
        Last edited by rabiecqa; 04-06-2011, 06:10 AM.

        Comment

        • TonyBrooks
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 303

          #5
          How about possible DNA contamination? Have you DNase treated your samples?

          Comment

          • rabiecqa
            Junior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 8

            #6
            i have not treated with DNAse. do you think i should treat it ?
            because the experiment was in sterile environment (PSM: post security microbiology Level 2)

            Comment

            • TonyBrooks
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2009
              • 303

              #7
              I would. You could always treat a few samples with DNase I, stop the reaction with EDTA, then re-run on the Bioanalyser to check if there's an improvement.

              Comment

              • rabiecqa
                Junior Member
                • Feb 2011
                • 8

                #8
                Yes I'll treat with DNAse I because there some informations contort this idea and seem to be the same problem of mine.
                link of information: http://www.ambion.com/techlib/tn/112/10.html

                Comment

                • rabiecqa
                  Junior Member
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 8

                  #9
                  hi, it's was a DNA contamination.. The use of DNAse I solve the problem and there is no strange peak..
                  thanks for all!

                  Comment

                  • pmiguel
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 2328

                    #10
                    Good call Tony!
                    Mysterious to me though. Genomic DNA I expect to be mainly >50kb -- which would likely not even show up on a nanochip. If something degraded the bacterial chromosome down to ~1 kb, I guess that is what you would see. Maybe there was some DNAse in earlier steps, but it did not result in a complete digestion?

                    --
                    Phillip

                    Comment

                    • Zapp
                      Junior Member
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 6

                      #11
                      I would rather assume that the RNeasy columns selectively bind low molecular DNA.

                      Zapp

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                      0 responses
                      15 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                      0 responses
                      32 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
                      0 responses
                      34 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
                      0 responses
                      23 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...