Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • seqgirl123
    Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 78

    shearing question using Covaris

    Would like to understand something when I use Covaris for shearing.

    I have DNA that has been diluted to 5ug in 120ul for shearing or 41ng/ul. I shear and measure concentration by Picogreen. But it is about 30ng/ul after shearing. Why does the concentration drop? It is only sheared DNA, not cleaned. Is it due to the DNA being less compact after shearing? Does it have anything to do that DNA is fragmented now and this causes the concentration to drop? I have tried other DNAs and their concentrations drop just like this.
  • ECO
    --Site Admin--
    • Oct 2007
    • 1360

    #2
    Single stranded regions. (?)

    Comment

    • LMcSeq
      Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 33

      #3
      Agreed-PicoGreen is intended to measure double stranded DNA. If the shearing resulted in any single stranded material, that would not be detected.

      Comment

      • Hamid
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 108

        #4
        Hi seqgirl123,

        What you are noticing is how pico green method is used for concentration determination. Two points of interest:

        1. Pico green binding to DNA and its intensity is dependent on the size of DNA. It is recommended that you generate a standard curve using DNA in in the same size range as the distribution of your fragments after shearing. If you use a standard curve that has been generated using large DNA such as lambda, the concentration from that standard curve will not apply accurately to the smaller sheared material.
        2. Quite a few service labs use a combination of pico green and A260/A280 to check the quality and concentration of their samples. If you test the samples you mentioned on a nano drop or equivalent system, you will notice that there is very very minimal loss of your samples.

        Thank you

        Hamid

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...