Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JueFish
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 42

    EST alignments without genome

    Hi all,

    Wondering if anyone could offer me some suggestions on how to approach an analysis. Currently, I am examining a transcriptome and looking at some "known" elements of that transcriptome and looking to see if I can identify any alternative transcripts/evidence for gene duplication in the predicted transcripts for these known elements. This is a non-model species and there is not enough genome sequence for me to effectively map my predicted transcripts(i.e. ESTs, basically) in order to predict splice site. I can identify regions of the transcripts that are strong matches for conserved protein domains, however. I can use blast to do this. Currently, I am using a round-about approach where after using blast results to identify sequences of interests, I then have to go through by hand (or just a very hands-on fashion) and generate clusters and/or alignments for these sequences and try to figure out where they overall, to what degree and if they might represent transcript fragments, novel isoforms or possible gene duplication events. What I kind of would like to do is to align these transcript sequences to some kind of genome-like track, but for proteins, in a some kind of viewer. The EST alignments, however, have proved to be a challenge due to the breaks and gap in alignments. Does anyone have any thoughts on a good way to generate the kind of data I would like (basicaly, use EST alignment to identify exons and alignment of that data to a protein structure to identify the coding regions? Or maybe a better tool/approach to address this type of question with the kind of de novo transcriptome data that I have?

    I appreciate any suggestions.

    Cheers,
    Nate

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
51 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
110 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...