Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • plumb_r
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2012
    • 6

    #1

    Finding reads shared between 2 bam files

    Hi
    I have mapped bisulfite converted HiSeq reads separately to in silico converted forward & reverse strands so have files
    Code:
    sample.forward.bam
    sample.reverse.bam
    I now would like a count of the reads which map to both and only both of the strands i.e. those which are in both forward & reverse bam files but not in only one of them.
    Any ideas?
    I was thinking of using either:
    Code:
    samtools merge out.bam sample.forward.bam sample.reverse.bam
    but can't work out how this would help
    Could another option could be to use bedtools to convert both bam to bed & then intersect these? Something like:
    Code:
    bamToBed -i sample.forward.bam > for.reads.bed
    bamToBed -i sample.reverse.bam > rev.reads.bed
    intersectBed -a .for.reads.bed -b rev.reads.bed -c
    Would this work?
    Thanks
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    This will somewhat depend on how you did the alignments. You also run into the problem of whether to consider a read that just barely mapped to say, the original top strand (assume a large edit distance), but mapped perfectly with no edits to the original bottom strand as actually mapping to both strands or not.

    Converting the alignments to BED files and then intersecting them won't do what you want, since you'll be intersecting covered areas rather than whether an individual read maps (e.g. if a read aligns to chr1 of the top strand and chr2 of the bottom strand then the intersection (which is coordinate based) won't work). You could merge the alignments and name sort them and then just write a program to process that. That would be quite straight forward. You could also use an almost identical program on the unmerged files to save a step (and some time).

    Might I ask what you're trying to accomplish with this? If you're trying to just figure out which of your reads to exclude from downstream analysis because of ambiguous mapping then you could just rerun the alignments with Bismark or Bison (of which I'm the author).
    Last edited by dpryan; 07-17-2013, 02:01 AM. Reason: said BAM and meant BED!

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...