Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marco12345
    Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 19

    clustal alignment

    Hi all,

    I have to plan a little my work, and I have a question I am not finding answer.
    How long could a clustal run be?

    That would be using clustalw-2.1, and doing a multiple alignment on 10 fasta sequences of about 150 kb. The type of alignment is "slow/accurate", the ouput a PHYLIP file, and all the options are on default values.
    I'm thinking on running it on a MacBook 3.1 with 4 Gb of RAM.

    What do you think? Would that be too much for a laptop?

    Thanks in advance.

    Marco
  • chuanchao
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 3

    #2
    why not use mega?

    Comment

    • rhinoceros
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 372

      #3
      No, but I'd use muscle instead of clustal..
      savetherhino.org

      Comment

      • jimmybee
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2010
        • 119

        #4
        From my experience with mitochondrial and chloroplast alignments, Id say less than a week. You could try Clustal-omeg. Im pretty sure its multi-threaded

        Your laptop should handle it

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          Today, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        6 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...