Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • starbug16
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 8

    Trinity RAM issue

    Hi,

    Having managed to whittle down my Illumina data to 31 million reads, I am trying to run Trinity with 16 CPUs and 16 gigabytes of RAM. Everything works fine until I get to Butterfly which seems to bog down the server so much so that I can't even connect in to check progress and end up having to kill the process.

    Guessing that I don't have enough RAM. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to work around this???

    Thanks in advance
  • Birdman
    Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 21

    #2
    What is your Trinity command line?

    Comment

    • Wallysb01
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 286

      #3
      For butterfly you’re going to have to drop the CPUs and RAM usage down from defaults or from what you set in other parts of the trinity run. You can control that with:

      --bflyHeapSpaceMax
      --bflyCPU

      You should probably just be running with two CPUs and 8GB of ram set as the bflyHeapSpaceMax

      Comment

      • starbug16
        Junior Member
        • Feb 2014
        • 8

        #4
        Thanks, will definitely give that a try. Probably a how long is a piece of string question but...how long do you think it will take to complete?

        Comment

        • Birdman
          Member
          • Jan 2014
          • 21

          #5
          I really depends on the amount of reads you have. As an example, in my experience using the latest Trinity version, 1 billion reads took 6-7 days using 64 cores and 256G memory.

          Comment

          • Wallysb01
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2011
            • 286

            #6
            with only 2 cores running and 31M reads, hopefully run time is not much more than 24 hours.

            Comment

            • starbug16
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2014
              • 8

              #7
              OK, so running on 2 cores and it's run 0.8% of commands overnight. Guessing it may take a while Not sure there is a coffee break long enough for this run

              Comment

              • Wallysb01
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2011
                • 286

                #8
                You could drop the RAM usage for each butterfly run more to get 4 cores going instead of 2, but you’ll risk having a lot of jobs to rerun.

                Why are you working with only 16GB of RAM but 16 cores? Is this a machine with DDR2 memory? Can you upgrade that RAM? A modern desktop should be able to get you up to 32 GB, and a relatively cheap workstation (i.e. $5000) will give you 16 cores and 128GB of RAM. If you’re going to be doing this much it would be worth it to get something modern or finding a cluster with something better.

                Comment

                • starbug16
                  Junior Member
                  • Feb 2014
                  • 8

                  #9
                  Ah, just the usual academic institution tug of war between money needing to be spent to be able to do research and them wanting the work in already to justify it. This server was never supposed to be for assembly and they aren't necessarily willing to stump up the cash to add the RAM A month wait for their assembly should do the trick

                  Thanks for the advice guys, it's much appreciated it's at least running now, just going to take a wee while!

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • GATTACAT
                    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by GATTACAT
                    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by SEQadmin2


                    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                  0 responses
                  7 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                  0 responses
                  12 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                  0 responses
                  20 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                  0 responses
                  54 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...