Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • colaneri
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 30

    #1

    differentially methylated sites with methylKit

    I want to generate an outfile containing or C site (CG, CHG or CHH) that are differentially methylated (DM) using the R package methylKit

    The problem is that I got a file that is empty.

    I understand that outfiles listing hypermethylated or Hypomethylated can be empty simply because there are not DM sites between the compared samples. However I'm sure this is not the case and please let me explain before go to my question.

    I have 4 samples ( control vs treatment with 2 replicates each). If I compare tiles of 100 bp with a step.size of 50 I get a bunch of DMRs. However if I try to found difference with single base resolution I got nothing. This do not have sense to me and I suspect I'm doing something wrong during the analysis. I willl appreciate if someone can read the commands i used and help me to identify my error.

    #### Methyl seq sample detail
    SAMPLE

    C4_ctrl BC1 REP1 control
    C7_ctrl BC5 REP2 control

    C4_PEG BC3 REP1 treatment
    C7_PEG BC7 REP2 treatment



    ### In this example I'm comparing control=ctrl samples against the
    ## treatment=PEG in any context (CG, CHG, CHH) from; chr1
    > library(methylKit);
    > library(graphics);
    > comparisonName="C_ctrl_vs_C_PEG_anyContext_site_by_site";ou
    > chrom="chr1";
    > C4_ctrl="BC1"; C7_ctrl="BC5";
    > C4_PEG="BC3"; C7_PEG="BC7";
    > ctrl1=paste(C4_ctrl, chrom, "MethylKit.inputdata.anyContext.txt", sep=".");
    > ctrl2=paste(C7_ctrl, chrom, "MethylKit.inputdata.anyContext.txt", sep=".");
    >PEG1=paste(C4_PEG, chrom, "MethylKit.inputdata.anyContext.txt", sep=".");
    >PEG2=paste(C7_PEG, chrom, "MethylKit.inputdata.anyContext.txt", sep=".");
    > file.list <- list(ctrl1,ctrl2,PEG1,PEG2);
    > myobj <- read(file.list, sample.id = list(ctrl1,ctrl2,PEG1,PEG2), assembly="TAIR10", treatment=c(1,1,0,0), context="anyContext");
    filtered.myobj=filterByCoverage(myobj,lo.count=10,lo.perc=NULL,hi.count=NULL,hi.perc=99.9)
    >meth <- unite(myobj, destrand = FALSE);
    >myDiff <- calculateDiffMeth(meth, num.cores=4);

    #filtering for significant differential methylation
    > myDiff.hyper <- get.methylDiff(myDiff, difference = 10, qvalue = 0.01, type = "hyper");
    > myDiff.hypo <- get.methylDiff(myDiff, difference = 10, qvalue = 0.01, type = "hypo");

    #output data for hypermethylated, hypomethylated, and all tiles

    > outfile1 = paste(comparisonName, chrom, "hyper", "txt", sep=".");
    write.table(as.data.frame(myDiff.hyper), file=outfile1, sep="\t", col.names=TRUE, row.names=FALSE);
    > outfile2 = paste(comparisonName, chrom, "hypo", "txt", sep=".");
    write.table(as.data.frame(myDiff.hypo), file=outfile2, sep="\t", col.names=TRUE, row.names=FALSE);
    > outfile3 = paste(comparisonName, chrom, "united", "txt", sep=".");
    write.table(as.data.frame(meth), file=outfile3, sep="\t", col.names=TRUE, row.names=FALSE);

    ###the result is that outfile 1 and outfile2 are empty.. What I did wrong?

    ###I will appreciate any help

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
30 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
22 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
39 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...