Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • colaneri
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 30

    differentially methylated sites with methylKit

    I want to generate an outfile containing or C site (CG, CHG or CHH) that are differentially methylated (DM) using the R package methylKit

    The problem is that I got a file that is empty.

    I understand that outfiles listing hypermethylated or Hypomethylated can be empty simply because there are not DM sites between the compared samples. However I'm sure this is not the case and please let me explain before go to my question.

    I have 4 samples ( control vs treatment with 2 replicates each). If I compare tiles of 100 bp with a step.size of 50 I get a bunch of DMRs. However if I try to found difference with single base resolution I got nothing. This do not have sense to me and I suspect I'm doing something wrong during the analysis. I willl appreciate if someone can read the commands i used and help me to identify my error.

    #### Methyl seq sample detail
    SAMPLE

    C4_ctrl BC1 REP1 control
    C7_ctrl BC5 REP2 control

    C4_PEG BC3 REP1 treatment
    C7_PEG BC7 REP2 treatment



    ### In this example I'm comparing control=ctrl samples against the
    ## treatment=PEG in any context (CG, CHG, CHH) from; chr1
    > library(methylKit);
    > library(graphics);
    > comparisonName="C_ctrl_vs_C_PEG_anyContext_site_by_site";ou
    > chrom="chr1";
    > C4_ctrl="BC1"; C7_ctrl="BC5";
    > C4_PEG="BC3"; C7_PEG="BC7";
    > ctrl1=paste(C4_ctrl, chrom, "MethylKit.inputdata.anyContext.txt", sep=".");
    > ctrl2=paste(C7_ctrl, chrom, "MethylKit.inputdata.anyContext.txt", sep=".");
    >PEG1=paste(C4_PEG, chrom, "MethylKit.inputdata.anyContext.txt", sep=".");
    >PEG2=paste(C7_PEG, chrom, "MethylKit.inputdata.anyContext.txt", sep=".");
    > file.list <- list(ctrl1,ctrl2,PEG1,PEG2);
    > myobj <- read(file.list, sample.id = list(ctrl1,ctrl2,PEG1,PEG2), assembly="TAIR10", treatment=c(1,1,0,0), context="anyContext");
    filtered.myobj=filterByCoverage(myobj,lo.count=10,lo.perc=NULL,hi.count=NULL,hi.perc=99.9)
    >meth <- unite(myobj, destrand = FALSE);
    >myDiff <- calculateDiffMeth(meth, num.cores=4);

    #filtering for significant differential methylation
    > myDiff.hyper <- get.methylDiff(myDiff, difference = 10, qvalue = 0.01, type = "hyper");
    > myDiff.hypo <- get.methylDiff(myDiff, difference = 10, qvalue = 0.01, type = "hypo");

    #output data for hypermethylated, hypomethylated, and all tiles

    > outfile1 = paste(comparisonName, chrom, "hyper", "txt", sep=".");
    write.table(as.data.frame(myDiff.hyper), file=outfile1, sep="\t", col.names=TRUE, row.names=FALSE);
    > outfile2 = paste(comparisonName, chrom, "hypo", "txt", sep=".");
    write.table(as.data.frame(myDiff.hypo), file=outfile2, sep="\t", col.names=TRUE, row.names=FALSE);
    > outfile3 = paste(comparisonName, chrom, "united", "txt", sep=".");
    write.table(as.data.frame(meth), file=outfile3, sep="\t", col.names=TRUE, row.names=FALSE);

    ###the result is that outfile 1 and outfile2 are empty.. What I did wrong?

    ###I will appreciate any help

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...